Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Ultrastructural analysis of autophagosome organization using mammalian autophagy-deficient cells
Chieko Kishi-Itakura, Ikuko Koyama-Honda, Eisuke Itakura, Noboru Mizushima
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 4089-4102; doi: 10.1242/jcs.156034
Chieko Kishi-Itakura
1Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ikuko Koyama-Honda
1Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eisuke Itakura
1Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noboru Mizushima
1Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nmizu@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    FIP200-deficient cells show accumulation of selective autophagic substrates but no isolation membranes. (A) Wild-type (WT) and FIP200-knockout (KO) MEFs with or without stable expression of the indicated constructs were cultured in starvation (St) medium for 1–2 h and subjected to fluorescence microscopy. Endogenous ATG16L1, LC3, ATG9A and p62 were stained. Scale bars: 10 µm (white), 1 µm (yellow). (B–F) FIP200-knockout MEFs under growth conditions (B), and FIP200-knockout MEFs (C), FIP200-knockout MEFs expressing GFP–ATG9A (D) and HeLa cells treated with siRNA against FIP200 (E,F) under starvation conditions for 1 h were fixed and subjected to conventional electron microscopy (B,E) and immunoelectron microscopy using anti-p62 (C,F) and anti-GFP antibodies (D). A magnified image of the high-density cluster is shown in the inset in B. Arrowheads, clusters of high-density particles; arrows, ER surrounding the ribosome-free area; double-headed arrows, vesicles inside and at the periphery of the ribosome-free area. Scale bars: 500 nm [B,D (upper panel),E,F], 50 nm (B, inset), 200 nm (C), 100 nm [D (lower panel)].

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    ATG9A-deficient cells show structures similar to those observed in FIP200-deficient cells. (A) ATG9A-knockout (KO) MEFs with or without stable expression of the indicated constructs were cultured in starvation medium for 1–2 h and subjected to fluorescence microscopy. Endogenous ATG16L1, LC3 and p62 were stained. Scale bars: 10 µm, 1 µm (inset). (B–E) ATG9A-knockout MEFs (B), HeLa cells treated with siRNA against ATG9A (C,D) and wild-type (WT) (Ea) and ATG9A-knockout (Eb,c) MEFs expressing GFP–ULK1 were cultured in starvation medium for 1 h and subjected to conventional electron microscopy (B,C) and immunoelectron microscopy using anti-p62 (D) and anti-GFP (E) antibodies. Arrowheads, clusters of high-density particles; arrows, ER surrounding the ribosome-free area; double-headed arrows, vesicles inside and at the periphery of the ribosome-free area. Scale bars: 500 nm (Ea,b), 200 nm (B–D,Ec).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    The high-density particle clustered at the autophagosome formation site is ferritin. (A,B) Wild-type (WT), FIP200-knockout (KO) and ATG9A-knockout MEFs (A) and HeLa cells treated with oligos against ATG9A or control oligos (luciferase, siLuc) (B) were cultured in regular medium. Cells were stained with anti-ferritin (green) and anti-p62 (red) antibodies. Scale bars: 10 µm (white), 1 µm (yellow). (C) ATG9A-knockout MEFs (a,b) and HeLa cells treated with siRNA against ATG9A (c,d) were cultured in starvation medium for 1 h and subjected to immunoelectron microscopy using an anti-ferritin antibody. Panels b and d show magnified images of the indicated areas in panels a and c, respectively. Scale bars: 500 nm (a,c), 100 nm (b,d). Arrowheads, ferritin-positive high-density particle clusters. (D) ATG9A-knockout MEFs stably expressing GFP–ULK1 cultured in regular medium were analyzed by immunocytochemistry using anti-GFP (green) and anti-ferritin (red) antibodies. Scale bars: 10 µm (white), 1 µm (yellow).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Accumulation of small isolation-membrane-like structures in VMP1-silenced cells. (A) HeLa cells treated with siRNA against VMP1 with or without stable expression of the indicated constructs were cultured in starvation medium for 1–2 h and subjected to fluorescence microscopy. Endogenous ATG9A, LC3 and p62 (red) were stained. Scale bars: 10 µm (white); 1 µm (yellow). (B–F) HeLa cells treated with siRNA against VMP1 with (E) or without (B–D,F) stable expression of GFP–DFCP1 were cultured in regular (B) or starvation (St) medium (B–F) for 1 h and subjected to conventional electron microscopy (B) and immunoelectron microscopy using anti-p62 (C), anti-LC3 (D), anti-GFP (E) and anti-ATG9A antibodies (F). Arrowheads, ferritin clusters; arrows, ER surrounding the ribosome-free area; double-headed arrows, vesicles inside and at the periphery of the ribosome-free area; asterisks, small isolation membrane (IM)-like structures. The graph in B indicates the number of isolation-membrane-like structures (longer than 200 nm) per p62-positive region. Data are presented as the mean±s.e.m. of 37 [growth, St (-)] and 57 [starvation, St 1 h] p62-positive regions. Scale bars: 500 nm (B), 200 nm (C–F), 50 nm (D,F, inset).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Accumulation of small autophagosome-like structures in ATG2A/B-silenced cells. (A) HeLa cells treated with siRNA against ATG2A and ATG2B were cultured in regular or starvation (St) medium for 1 h and subjected to conventional electron microscopy. The graph indicates the number of small autophagosome-like structures (asterisks) per p62-positive region. Data are presented as the mean±s.e.m. of 11 [growth, St (-)] and 46 [starvation, St 1 h] different p62-positive regions. Arrowheads, ferritin clusters; arrows, ER surrounding the ribosome-free area; double-headed arrows, vesicles inside and at the periphery of the ribosome-free area; asterisks, small autophagosome (AP)-like structures. Scale bars: 500 nm. (B) HeLa cells treated with siRNA against luciferase (data shown in Fig. 3B), VMP1 or ATG2A/B were cultured in regular medium and subjected to fluorescence microscopy. Endogenous ferritin (green) and p62 (red) were stained. Scale bars: 10 µm (white), 1 µm (yellow). (C–E) HeLa cells treated with siRNA against ATG2A/B were starved and analyzed by immunoelectron microscopy using anti-p62 (C), anti-LC3 (D) and anti-ATG9A antibodies (E). Arrowheads, ferritin clusters. Scale bars: 200 nm (C,Da,E), 50 nm (Db,E inset).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Isolation membranes formed in ATG5-deficient cells. (A) ATG5-knockout (KO) MEFs with or without stable expression of the indicated constructs were cultured in starvation medium for 1 h and subjected to fluorescence microscopy. Endogenous ATG16L1, ATG9A and p62 were stained. Scale bars: 10 µm. (B–D) Wild-type (WT) and ATG5-knockout MEFs (B) and HeLa cells treated with siRNA against ATG5 (C,D) were cultured in starvation medium for 1 h and subjected to conventional electron microscopy (B,C) and immunoelectron microscopy using an anti-ferritin antibody (D). Arrowheads, ferritin clusters; arrows, ER surrounding the ribosome-free area; double-headed arrows, vesicles inside and at the periphery of the ribosome-free area. Scale bars: 200 nm (B,C), 500 nm (D), 100 nm (D, inset).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Ferritin is selectively incorporated in autophagosomes and delivered to lysosomes. (A) MEFs stably expressing GFP–ULK1 or GFP–LC3 were cultured in starvation (St) medium with or without 100 nM bafilomycin A1 (Baf A) for 1 h. Cells were fixed and stained with an anti-ferritin antibody and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. The outlined areas in each image are shown at higher magnification to the right. Arrows, colocalization of GFP and ferritin signals. Scale bars: 20 µm (left), 4 µm (right). Quantification of the ferritin-positive ratio (%) of total GFP–ULK1 or GFP–LC3 punctate structures is shown in the graph (circles). Triangles represent the random overlapping ratio (%) of the colocalization (ferritin-positive ratio) (see Methods). (B) Wild-type (WT) MEFs cultured in regular medium were analyzed by immunoelectron microscopy using an anti-ferritin antibody. Arrowheads (light blue), autophagosomes. Scale bars: 500 nm, 100 nm (inset). (C) Wild-type, ATG9A-knockout (KO) and FIP200-knockout MEFs were cultured in regular medium in the presence or absence of 50 µM pepstatin (pep) A and 50 µM E64d for 24 h. Cells were fixed and stained with anti-Lamp1 and anti-ferritin antibodies, and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Arrows, colocalization of Lamp1 and ferritin signals. Scale bars: 20 µm (left), 4 µm (right). Quantification of the ferritin-positive ratio (%) of total Lamp1 punctate structures is shown as in A. For graphs in A and C, data represent the mean±s.e.m. (seven randomly selected cells); *P<0.05, **P<0.01; unpaired Student's t-test.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Model of autophagosome biogenesis. (I) Autophagosome formation is initiated on or close to the ER by recruitment of the ULK1–FIP200 complex, ATG9A vesicles and the autophagy-specific PtdIns 3-kinase complex. Deletion of FIP200 or ATG9A, or treatment with the PtdIns 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin, completely suppresses formation of the isolation membrane, leading to the accumulation of vesicles and selective substrates, such as p62 and ferritin clusters, near the ER (structure A). (II,III) Small isolation membranes are formed and elongate. Deletion of VMP1 or ATG2A/B inhibits elongation of this membrane. Deletion of VMP1 and ATG2A/B causes accumulation of small isolation-membrane-like structures (structure B) and small autophagosome-like structures (structure C), respectively. (IV) Elongated isolation membranes are sealed to form autophagosomes. Depletion of ATG5 likely inhibits the closure step and causes the accumulation of isolation membranes that retain association with the ER (structure D).

Previous Article
Back to top
Previous Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Autophagosome
  • ATG
  • Ferritin
  • p62
  • Sqstm1

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ultrastructural analysis of autophagosome organization using mammalian autophagy-deficient cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Ultrastructural analysis of autophagosome organization using mammalian autophagy-deficient cells
Chieko Kishi-Itakura, Ikuko Koyama-Honda, Eisuke Itakura, Noboru Mizushima
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 4089-4102; doi: 10.1242/jcs.156034
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Ultrastructural analysis of autophagosome organization using mammalian autophagy-deficient cells
Chieko Kishi-Itakura, Ikuko Koyama-Honda, Eisuke Itakura, Noboru Mizushima
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 4089-4102; doi: 10.1242/jcs.156034

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Human-specific staphylococcal virulence factors enhance pathogenicity in a humanised zebrafish C5a receptor model
  • Jagged–Notch-mediated divergence of immune cell crosstalk maintains the anti-inflammatory response in visceral leishmaniasis
  • PDZD8 mediated lipid transfer at ER-LE/lys contacts is required for LE/lys positioning and neurite outgrowth
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Imaging

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Cell scientist to watch: Janet Iwasa

Read our interview with molecular animator Janet Iwasa, where she talks about her transition from the wet lab, explains how animation can facilitate research and discusses the challenges of the field.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Mole – The Corona files

“Despite everything, it's just incredible that we get to do science.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992