Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
DAPK–HSF1 interaction as a positive-feedback mechanism stimulating TNF-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells
Natalya Benderska, Jelena Ivanovska, Tilman T. Rau, Jan Schulze-Luehrmann, Suma Mohan, Saritha Chakilam, Muktheshwar Gandesiri, Elisabeth Ziesché, Thomas Fischer, Stephan Söder, Abbas Agaimy, Luitpold Distel, Heinrich Sticht, Vijayalakshmi Mahadevan, Regine Schneider-Stock
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 5273-5287; doi: 10.1242/jcs.157024
Natalya Benderska
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jelena Ivanovska
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tilman T. Rau
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Schulze-Luehrmann
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suma Mohan
2Faculty of School of Chemical & Biotechnology of the SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613401, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saritha Chakilam
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muktheshwar Gandesiri
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth Ziesché
33rd Medical Department, Medical University, 55122 Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Fischer
4Center of Internal Medicine, Clinic of Hematology/Oncology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan Söder
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abbas Agaimy
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luitpold Distel
5Department of Radiation Oncology, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heinrich Sticht
6Institute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vijayalakshmi Mahadevan
2Faculty of School of Chemical & Biotechnology of the SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613401, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Regine Schneider-Stock
1Department of Experimental Tumor Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen 91054, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: regine.schneider-stock@uk-erlangen.de
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    pHSF1Ser230 is upregulated by TNF in colon cancer cells. (A) Peptide alignment of HSF1 from various species. Putative DAPK phosphorylation sites are boxed in gray. (B) HCT116 cells (DAPK wt) and HCT116 cells with DAPK knocked down by shRNA (shDAPK) were treated with 0.66 ng/ml TNF. At the indicated time-points, whole-cell lysates were prepared and equal amounts of protein were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with the specific antibodies indicated. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Ctrl, control. (C) Colorectal tumor tissue lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies as indicated. γ-tubulin was used as a loading control. (D) Interaction of the DAPK–HSF1–CaMKII complex. The catalytic domain of DAPK (PDB ID: 1JKS) was docked to HSF1 modeled using the PDB IDs 2LDU (10–123), 4DZM and 1EXU (126–203), 3K9J (200–260), 2VBC (203–310), 1Z05 (311–371), 2WLX and 3OOQ (371–529). CaMKII in its active form was modeled with the PDB ID 3KK8 as a template and was then docked to the DAPK–pHSF1Ser230 complex. HSF1 is shown in green, CaMKII is indicated in blue and the DAPK kinase domain is shown in pink. Phosphorylated residue Ser230 of HSF1 is shown as a red sphere. (E) HCT116 cells were treated with 10 µM KN62 (CaMKII inhibitor) or 10 µM DAPK inhibitor (DI), with or without 0.66 ng/ml TNF. At 24 h after treatment, cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with the specific antibodies indicated. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (F) Recombinant HSF1–His (1 µg) was incubated with recombinant CaMKII (0.5 µg) and ATP (200 µM) in CaMKII kinase buffer in the presence of 10 µM KN62 (CaMKII inhibitor) or 10 µM DAPK inhibitor at 30°C for 30 min. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The level of phosphorylation was determined using a specific antibody against pHSF1Ser230. (G) Colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines DLD1 and Caco2 were treated with 0.66 ng/ml TNF. At the indicated time-points, cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with the specific antibodies indicated. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (H) Western blot analysis of HCEC cell lysate treated with 0.66 ng/ml TNF for the indicated times. Blots were immunoprobed with the indicated antibodies. Blots from representative experiments are shown (n = 3). In all cases the ratio of pHSF1Ser230∶HSF1 was calculated using ImageJ and the control of each cell line was adjusted to 1.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    DAPK interacts with HSF1 in vivo and in vitro. (A) A model of the DAPK kinase domain in complex with a substrate peptide comprising HSF1 residues 227–233. Left panel, the backbone topology of DAPK is shown in shades from blue to green and the bound ATP is shown in stick presentation (coloring according to the atom types). The key residues Arg227 and Ser230 of the HSF-1 peptide and Glu100 of DAPK are shown in stick presentation. The Ser230 sidechain is located in proximity to the terminal phosphoryl group of the ATP and Arg227 interacts with Glu100 and the ribose oxygens of ATP (magenta arrow). Right panel, space-filled representation of the complex (same view as in the left panel). The kinase domain is shown in cyan and the key interacting residues are colored according to their atom type. (B) Recombinant DAPK–GST catalytic domain or recombinant GST proteins, immobilized on glutathione–agarose beads, were incubated with equal amounts of recombinant HSF1–His in binding buffer. Western blotting indicated that the proteins precipitated with glutathione–agarose beads (‘B’) and 10% of unbound target protein from the supernatant (SN) fraction using specific antibody. After probing with the first antibody, the membrane was stripped and reblotted with the next antibody. The asterisk indicates a nonspecific band for the GST antibody. M, biotinylated molecular mass marker. (C) HCT116 cells were transiently transfected with DAPK–HA (2 µg) construct. The transfection medium was changed after 6 h, and the cells were supplied with fresh TNF-containing medium. Cells were harvested at the indicated time-points after TNF stimulus. DAPK was immunoprecipitated (IP) using a specific antibody, and the bound products were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. IgG beads were incubated with DAPK-specific antibody and used as a negative control. Input controls (5% of the extract used for immunoprecipitation) are shown in the lower panel. Blots from representative experiments are shown (n = 3). Ctrl, control. (D) HCT116 cells were treated with 0.66 ng/ml TNF for 24 h and fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde. The subcellular location of endogenous pHSF1Ser230 (red) and DAPK (green) was analyzed by confocal microscopy. DAPI staining (blue) was used to identify nuclei. Arrows indicate fragmented chromatin. Scale bar: 12 µm. n = 3 for all experiments.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    DAPK phosphorylates HSF1 in vivo, in vitro and in silico. (A) HCT116 cells were transfected with wild-type (WT) DAPK, DAPK K42A dead mutant, S308A and S308D mutants. Empty vector (EV) was used as a negative control. Immunoprecipitation (IP) was performed using a DAPK-specific antibody. Magnetic beads were washed and incubated with recombinant HSF1–His (1 µg) in the presence of 7.5 µCi [γ-32P]ATP and 200 µM ATP in DAPK kinase buffer for 30 min at 30°C. The samples were subjected to separation by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography. (B) Protein expression level of wild-type DAPK and K42A, S308A and S308D mutants and empty vector in transfected HCT116 cells was assessed by western blotting using a DAPK-specific antibody. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (C) Recombinant HSF1–His (1 µg) was incubated with a GST-tagged catalytic domain of DAPK (0.5 µg) and ATP (200 µM) in DAPK kinase buffer, in the absence or presence of DAPK inhibitor (DI; 10 and 30 µM) at 30°C for 30 min. The products of the in vitro phosphorylation reaction were divided into two parts. Half was resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blotting, and the other half was used as a loading control. One membrane was used for all indicated antibodies. The lower panel represents Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining and indicates equal protein loading. The first lane contains a prestained protein marker (PeqGold V, Peqlab); the second lane contains a biotinylated marker (‘M’). Input indicates the amount of protein used in the in vitro phosphorylation reaction. Incubation of recombinant GST and HSF1–His in the presence of cold ATP was used as a negative control. All experiments were repeated at least three times, and representative data are shown. (D) Interface of the HSF1–DAPK complex with the DAPK inhibitor. HSF1 and DAPK are shown in green and pink, respectively. DAPK inhibitor is shown in blue. Residues within 4 Å of the inhibitor are shown in stick representation. (E) Conformational changes in the DAPK catalytic domain upon inhibitor binding. Superposed structures of the DAPK catalytic domain available in PDB ID: 1JKS (blue), inhibitor-bound conformation of DAPK (green) and catalytic domain with inhibitor bound to HSF1 (pink) are superposed. DAPK inhibitor is shown in stick representation. Regions in DAPK showing conformational rearrangements are highlighted (red circles).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    HSF1 is triggering DAPK-dependent apoptosis by TNF. (A) Scatter plots of flow cytometric analysis of annexin-V and propidium iodide staining of untreated HCT116 cells (ctrl), HCT116 cells subjected to 0.66 ng/ml TNF treatment (TNF), HCT116 cells transfected with either HSF1–HA cDNA (HSF1) or with HSF1 S230A or S230E mutant plasmids. pHACE-HA cDNA was used for HCT116 cell transfection as an empty vector (EV). Also analyzed were HCT116 cells transfected with either HSF1 siRNA (siHSF1) or scrambled siRNA, used as negative control (siNC). TNF treatment was performed at 6 h after transfection. The apoptosis rate was assessed as the sum of the lower right quadrant (early apoptosis) and upper right quadrant (late apoptosis). (B) Quantification of the mean annexin-V and propidium iodide fluorescence of the cell population (n = 3; ±s.e.m.). (C) HCT116 cells were transfected with 2 µg of wild-type HSF1–HA or S230A and S230E mutants. Empty vector was used as a negative control. Alternatively, 100 nM HSF1 siRNA or scrambled siRNA was transfected. At 6 h after transfection, fresh TNF-containing medium (or medium without TNF) was added. At 24 h after TNF incubation, cells were harvested, lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with the specific indicated antibodies. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Blots from representative experiments are shown (n = 3).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    The regulatory domain of HSF1 is involved in the pro-apoptotic response to TNF. (A) Upper panel, functional domains and potential DAPK phosphorylation motifs in human HSF1. DBD, DNA-binding domain; HR-A/B, harbour domain/leucine zipper trimerization domain; RD, regulatory domain; C, heptad repeat region C; AD, activation domain. Blue arrows show transcription-inhibitory phosphorylation; red arrows show transcription-inducing phosphorylation; white arrows indicate residues for which phosphorylation has unknown effects on gene transcription. Lower panel, schematic representation of the HSF1 cluster deletion mutant (CDM), containing partially excluded sequence of the regulatory domain (amino acids 250–370). WT, wild type. (B) HCT116 cells were transfected with 2 µg of HSF1-CDM–HA construct. Equal amounts of protein were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with the HSF1-specific antibody. The asterisk indicates endogenous HSF1. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Ctrl, control. (C) HCT116 cells were co-transfected with 1 µg of HSF1-CDM–HA and DAPK–FLAG constructs and treated with 0.66 ng/ml of TNF for 12 h. The subcellular localization of exogenous pHSF1Ser230 (red) and DAPK (green) was visualized by confocal microscopy. DAPI staining (blue) was used to identify nuclei. Arrows indicate fragmented chromatin. Scale bar: 12 µm. n = 2 for all experiments. (D) Scatter plots of flow cytometric analysis of annexin-V and propidium iodide staining of untreated HCT116 cells (Ctrl), HCT116 cells subjected to TNF treatment (TNF) and HCT116 cells transfected with either HSF1-CDM–HA cDNA (CDM) or empty vector (EV). TNF treatment was performed at the same time for all samples, 6 h after cDNA transfection, for 24 h. The apoptosis rate is determined as the sum of the lower right quadrant (early apoptosis) and upper right quadrant (late apoptosis). (E) Quantification of the mean annexin-V and propidium iodide fluorescence of the cell population (n = 3; ±s.e.m.).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    pHSF1Ser230 binds to the DAPK promoter. (A) Regulatory elements in the proximal human DAPK promoter. The numbering of nucleotides is relative to the transcriptional start site (+1). (B) HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with 2 µg of dual Gaussia Luciferase (GLuc)/secreted alkaline phosphatase (SeAP) constructs: GAPDH-PG04 (positive control), NEG-PG04 (negative control), DAPK promoter-PG04, HSF1–HA and empty vector (EV, pHACE, 2 µg) constructs. All luciferase assay results are expressed as relative light units (RLU) and presented as a ratio of the mean GLuc reporter to secreted alkaline phosphatase luminescence signals. The RLU values obtained from co-transfected cell samples were normalized to those co-transfected with the DAPK promoter-PG04 reporter and the pHACE empty vector. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times; representative experiments are depicted. Data show the mean±s.d.; *P<0.05; **P<0.01 (unpaired two-tailed t-test). (C) Upper panel, ChIP assay using anti-pHSF1Ser230 was performed on HCT116 cell lysates. The DAPK promoter was identified by PCR amplification of the DNA fragments precipitated with anti-pHSF1Ser230 antibody. Input represents one-tenth of cleared supernatant. IgG immunoprecipitates (IP) were used as negative controls. Lower panel, immunoprecipitated DNA and input DNA were quantified by real-time PCR with primers specific for the HSE in the DAPK promoter (F1/R1). Data are represented as the mean±s.d.; *P<0.05 (unpaired two-tailed t-test). Ctrl, control. (D) Schematic representation of the primers designed for chromatin immunoprecipitation. The HSE in the DAPK promoter is illustrated, and the HSE region was amplified by using the F1/R1 primers. Negative control regions without HSE motifs are amplified using the upstream F2/R2 or downstream F3/R3 primer pairs. The boxed white region indicates the primary transcript, and the black region indicates the ATG codon as the start of translation. (E) Immunoprecipitated and input DNA were quantified by real-time PCR with HSE-specific primers (F1/R1) and HSE-nonspecific primers (F2/R2 and F3/R3) in the DAPK promoter after 48 h of TNF treatment. Data are represented as the mean±s.d.; *P<0.05 (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test). All experiments were repeated at least three times.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Pattern of DAPK and pHSF1Ser230 expression in human colorectal tumor tissue as determined by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. Tumor 1. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-staining of colorectal cancer showed a cribriform pattern and mucous secretion. (B) Immunohistochemical analysis using the DAPK-specific antibody indicated moderate to strong cytoplasmic expression of DAPK in the tumor cells. (C) Immunohistochemical analysis using the pHSF1Ser230-specific antibody showed moderate expression of pHSF1Ser230 in both the cytoplasm and the nuclei of tumor cells. Tumor 2. (D) HE staining of rectal cancer showed a predominant tubular pattern. (E) Immunohistochemical analysis using the DAPK-specific antibody indicated complete absence of cytoplasmic DAPK. (F) Immunohistochemical analysis using the pHSF1Ser230-specific antibody demonstrated lack of pHSF1Ser230 in the tumor cells. Tumor 3. (G) HE staining of colorectal cancer showed poorly formed fused glands and extensive necrosis. (H) Strong cytoplasmic expression of DAPK is seen in this sample. (I) The same tumor lacked pHSF1Ser230 expression (except for nonspecific staining within secretion). Tumor 4. (J) HE staining of moderately differentiated colorectal carcinoma showed dilated glands and necrosis. (K) DAPK was not expressed in the cytoplasm of this tumor (faint non-specific nuclear staining). (L) The same sample showed pHSF1Ser230 expression within the apical cytoplasm of tumor cells. (M) This conventional sample showed a gradual increase in DAPK expression from the tumor center (upper left, ‘C’) to the invasion front (lower right, arrows). (N) The same sample showed a similar pattern for pHSF1Ser230 (as for DAPK in M). Original magnification for all photomicrographs is ×200.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Model for the DAPK–HSF1 interaction forming a positive-feedback loop in TNF-induced apoptosis. Following exposure to the TNF stimulus, HSF1 is activated and undergoes multisite phosphorylation. DAPK phosphorylates HSF1 at Ser230, which is crucial for further signal transduction within its regulatory domain, followed by its nuclear translocation. In the nucleus, HSF1 binds to the HSE in the DAPK promoter and initiates DAPK mRNA expression. As a result of this positive-feedback mechanism, the amount of pro-apoptotic DAPK in the cytoplasm increases, which leads to cell death in colon cancer cells.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • DAPK
  • HSF1
  • TNF
  • Apoptosis
  • Colon
  • Cancer

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
DAPK–HSF1 interaction as a positive-feedback mechanism stimulating TNF-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
DAPK–HSF1 interaction as a positive-feedback mechanism stimulating TNF-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells
Natalya Benderska, Jelena Ivanovska, Tilman T. Rau, Jan Schulze-Luehrmann, Suma Mohan, Saritha Chakilam, Muktheshwar Gandesiri, Elisabeth Ziesché, Thomas Fischer, Stephan Söder, Abbas Agaimy, Luitpold Distel, Heinrich Sticht, Vijayalakshmi Mahadevan, Regine Schneider-Stock
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 5273-5287; doi: 10.1242/jcs.157024
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
DAPK–HSF1 interaction as a positive-feedback mechanism stimulating TNF-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells
Natalya Benderska, Jelena Ivanovska, Tilman T. Rau, Jan Schulze-Luehrmann, Suma Mohan, Saritha Chakilam, Muktheshwar Gandesiri, Elisabeth Ziesché, Thomas Fischer, Stephan Söder, Abbas Agaimy, Luitpold Distel, Heinrich Sticht, Vijayalakshmi Mahadevan, Regine Schneider-Stock
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 5273-5287; doi: 10.1242/jcs.157024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • EFA6A, an exchange factor for Arf6, regulates early steps in ciliogenesis
  • SetDB1 and Su(var)3-9 play non-overlapping roles in somatic cell chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster
  • p.E152K-STIM1 mutation deregulates Ca2+ signaling contributing to chronic pancreatitis
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992