Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Maintenance of stereocilia and apical junctional complexes by Cdc42 in cochlear hair cells
Takehiko Ueyama, Hirofumi Sakaguchi, Takashi Nakamura, Akihiro Goto, Shigefumi Morioka, Aya Shimizu, Kazuki Nakao, Yoshitaka Hishikawa, Yuzuru Ninoyu, Hidetoshi Kassai, Shiro Suetsugu, Takehiko Koji, Bernd Fritzsch, Shigenobu Yonemura, Yasuo Hisa, Michiyuki Matsuda, Atsu Aiba, Naoaki Saito
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 2040-2052; doi: 10.1242/jcs.143602
Takehiko Ueyama
1Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tueyama@kobe-u.ac.jp naosaito@kobe-u.ac.jp
Hirofumi Sakaguchi
2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Nakamura
1Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akihiro Goto
3Laboratory of Bioimaging and Cell Signaling, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8315, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigefumi Morioka
1Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aya Shimizu
1Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuki Nakao
4Laboratory of Animal Resources, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshitaka Hishikawa
5Division of Histochemistry and Cell Biology, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuzuru Ninoyu
1Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hidetoshi Kassai
4Laboratory of Animal Resources, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shiro Suetsugu
6Laboratory of Membrane and Cytoskeleton Dynamics, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, Univeristy of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takehiko Koji
7Department of Histology and Cell Biology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernd Fritzsch
8Department of Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA 52242, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigenobu Yonemura
9Electron Microscope Laboratory, Center for Developmental Biology, RIKEN, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasuo Hisa
2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michiyuki Matsuda
3Laboratory of Bioimaging and Cell Signaling, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8315, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsu Aiba
4Laboratory of Animal Resources, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naoaki Saito
1Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tueyama@kobe-u.ac.jp naosaito@kobe-u.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Cdc42-mRNA expression in cochlea and Cdc42 localization at cochlear stereocilia. (A) In situ hybridization (upper panel) detects Cdc42 mRNA expression in cochlear inner hair cell (IHC, arrow) and outer hair cell (OHC; arrowheads) of P5 wild-type mice. The lower panel shows the relative Cdc42 mRNA signal level determined by the DAB image analyzer (red was assigned to positive). A 28S rRNA complementary oligo-DNA probe was used as a positive control. Scale bar: 50 µm. (B) Cdc42 (green) and filamentous actin (red) immunostaining in TCA-fixed organs of Corti from Cdc42flox/flox and Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice at P0. Note the absence of Cdc42 staining in stereocilia of Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice. Scale bars: 10 µm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Slowly progressive hearing and hair cell loss in Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice. (A) Age-related click ABR thresholds (dB SPL) in Cdc42flox/flox (cont, blue) and Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox (Cdc42-KO, red) mice. n≥4 animals; *P<0.05. (B) Age-related click and tone-burst (8, 16, 24 and 32 kHz) ABR thresholds in Cdc42flox/flox and Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice. Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice show a progressive and high-frequency sound-dominant hearing loss. n≥4; *P<0.05. (C) Age-related DPOAE (f2 frequency at 8, 12, 16 and 20 kHz) thresholds in Cdc42flox/flox and Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice. Progressive and high-frequency sound-dominant hearing loss is detected. n≥4; *P<0.05. (D) Representative (n≥4) Alexa-Fluor-488–phalloidin staining shows hair cell loss (white and red circles) in the middle turn of cochleae from Cdc42flox/flox and Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice at the age of 2, 4 and 8 weeks. (E) The percentages of remaining IHCs and OHCs in each turn in Cdc42flox/flox and Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice at 8 weeks. Note the IHC- and basal turn (Bs)-dominant hair cell loss. n≥3; *P<0.05. Ap, apical; Md, middle.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Cdc42 localization and function at the hair cell stereociliary membranes and AJCs. (A,B) Dissected organ of Corti from P1 wild-type mice cultured for 16 h and infected with the indicated adenoviruses (green). The top panels of A show membrane localization of GFP–Cdc42 covering an individual stereocilum (arrows) and at apical cell junctions in a IHC (arrowhead). Scale bar: 2 µm. The lower panels of A and B show reconstructed lateral view (in the xz axis) images of cochlear OHCs; GFP–Cdc42, but not GFP–Cdc42(17N;4A), is localized at the stereociliary membranes (arrow). Scale bars: 10 µm (C) Schematic representation of the intramolecular Cdc42 FRET biosensor: YPet and Turquoise-GL are variants of YFP and CFP, respectively. (D–G) Dissected organ of Corti from P2 Cdc42-FRET mice were observed under a two-photon excitation microscope. D, F and G are obtained from different organs of Corti. Scale bars: 10 µm. (D) The FRET/CFP ratio is highest at the stereocilia (arrowheads) and is higher at the apicolateral membranes (large arrow) than at the basolateral membranes (small arrow). Note that the image plane is oblique to the apical surface to show cross-sections of various depths, from the level of stereocilia to that of the basolateral membrane (see the illustration above it). A 3D movie is available in supplementary material Movie 1. (E) Schematic drawing showing an overview of IHCs and OHCs1–3 in an organ of Corti. (F) Composite image showing the FRET/CFP ratio of a series of five OHCs in the row of OHC3 obtained in serial sections from the base to top of stereocilia. Note that the five OHCs are obliquely aligned in vertical direction (see the illustration). The FRET/CFP ratio is higher in upper portions than in basal portions of stereocilia in all OHCs. (G) Representative FRET/CFP ratio images (n≥3) showing the effect of the Cdc42 inhibitor ML141 (before and 4 min after 500 µM ML141 treatment). The right-hand panel shows a quantification of these results (mean ± s.e.m.) showing that FRET/CFP ratios at the stereocilia and AJCs are significantly decreased by ML141. *P<0.01.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Degeneration of cochlear stereocilia in Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice. SEM images of the organ of Corti at the middle turn (A–J) and the apical turn (K–M) obtained from Cdc42flox/flox (cont; A,C,G) and Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox (B,D–F,H–M) mice at the age of P8 (E,F), 2 (H), 4 (I), 6 (J), and 8 weeks (A–D,G,K–M). (A) Both IHCs and OHCs are regularly aligned in a plane in Cdc42flox/flox mice at 8 weeks. (B) In Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice at 8 weeks, IHCs mostly disappeared, whereas OHCs are partially depleted and have scattered stereocilia. (C) In Cdc42flox/flox OHCs at 8 weeks, stereocilia have the characteristic W-profile. (D) In Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox OHCs at 8 weeks, stereocilia are fewer in number and have lost their characteristic W-profile and precise staircase pattern with consistent length of stereocilia in each row. (E,F) The morphology of IHC (E) and OHC (F) in Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice at P8 is identical to that in Cdc42flox/flox mice (not shown). (G) The regular array of stereocilia in IHCs of Cdc42flox/flox mice at 8 weeks. (H) In the middle turn of cochlea in Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice, stereocilia fusion (arrowheads) is first observed at 2 weeks. (I–M) The stereoilia fusion (arrowheads) and IHC loss (asterisks) increase in number through 4 (I) to 6 weeks (J). The apical turn of cochlea at 8 weeks retains some IHCs, which have frequently fused stereocilia (K–M, arrowheads), and long (L, arrows) and short stereocilia (M, double arrow). Scale bars: 5 µm (A,B); 2 µm (C–L).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Disturbed ultrastructure of stereocilia and AJCs in Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice. TEM images of IHCs at the middle turn of cochlea at 6 weeks of age. (A) In Cdc42flox/flox (cont) mice, IHCs and supporting cells (SC) are alternately aligned (left) and there is a thick actin-rich cuticular plate bordered by the arcuate-shaped AJCs with the circumferential actin belt (arrowheads) observed as a dense layer beneath the plasma membrane (right, magnified view). Stereocilia are located on the apical surface and each has a single rootlet inserted into the cuticular plate (arrow). (B) Upper panels: Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox (Cdc42-KO) mice are missing some IHCs, which were displaced by supporting cells, characterized by the apical microvilli. Lower panels: stereocilia in the remaining IHCs are often fused at the base (black arrows) and they contain several actin cores (black arrowheads) with rootlets (white arrows). The right two panels are close-up views of supporting cells with microvilli and neighboring hair cells (upper) and fused stereocilia base (lower). (C) Close-up views of the AJCs in Cdc42flox/flox (upper panels) and Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice (lower panels). Each panel shows a cross section of a supporting cell in the middle, flanked by two hair cells (asterisks). The AJCs display smooth and vertical arcs in controls but shows a range of ruffling in Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox mice. (D) Close-up views of the AJCs and perijunctional actin belts. Hair cells (asterisks) are on the right side. The actin belt (outlined by white dots) is thinner in Atoh1–Cre;Cdc42flox/flox hair cells. Scale bars: 1 µm (A,B); 500 nm (C); 200 nm (D).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Reduced number and shape-abnormalities of microvilli in MDCKCdc42-KD cells. (A) Confocal images of MDCKGFP-Cdc42 cells cultured in Matrigel and counterstained with Alexa-Fluor-568–phalloidin. Note the strong and weak GFP–Cdc42 accumulation at the apical (arrow) and lateral surfaces of cyst-cells (arrowheads), respectively. Scale bar: 10 µm. (B,C) Immunoblot showing the effects of three different shRNA-plasmids targeting canine Cdc42 (sh29, sh197, sh333) in MDCK cells. Using the most effective shRNA (sh197), two different clones (MDCKCdc42-KDa and MDCKCdc42-KDg) were established. (D) SEM images showing the apical surface of MDCK cells grown on a filter insert. Both MDCKCdc42-KDa and MDCKCdc42-KDg cell lines had substantially fewer microvilli compared with cells expressing a control shRNA (MDCKcont). Scale bar: 5 µm. (E) SEM images of MDCKcont and MDCKCdc42-KDg cells grown on a filter insert, and infected by the indicated adenoviruses. Colored insets show the GFP signal. Note the localization of GFP–Cdc42 at cell–cell junctions (arrowheads). Scale bars: 10 µm. (F) Recovery of reduced microvilli in MDCKCdc42-KDg cells by the expression of adenovirus-encoded GFP–Cdc42 but not GFP–Cdc42(17N;4A). *P<0.01. (G) High-power images obtained by scanning helium-ion microscope (SHIM) showing the range of morphological abnormalities in microvilli in MDCKCdc42-KDg cells. Black arrow, black arrowhead, red arrows, and red arrowhead showing shortened, lengthened, ragged and fused microvilli, respectively. Scale bar: 500 nm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Disruption of TJs in MDCKCdc42-KD cells. (A,B) Confocal images of ZO1 immunostaining in confluent MDCKcont (A) and MDCKCdc42-KDg (B) cells. Note the absence of ZO1 at cell–cell junctions in MDCKCdc42-KDg cells. (C,D) Confocal images of ZO1 immunostaining in MDCKCdc42-KDg cells infected by indicated adenoviruses. Note the presence of ZO1 immunostaining at cell–cell junctions in cells expressing GFP–Cdc42 (C) but not GFP–Cdc42(17N;4A) (D). Insets, DAPI staining. Scale bars: 20 µm.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Enhanced phosphorylation of cofilin and MYPT1 following Cdc42 knockdown. (A–C) Immunoblots of lysates from MDCKCdc42-KDa (a), MDCKCdc42-KDg (g) and MDCKcont cells to detect total and phosphorylated forms of PAK1/2 and LIMK (A), cofilin (B) and MYPT1 (C). Phospho-PAK1/2 is reduced whereas phosphorylation of LIMK, cofilin and MYPT1 are all increased in MDCKCdc42-KD cells. (D) Treatment of MDCKCdc42-KDg cells with Y27632 at indicated concentration for 10 h moderately and almost completely inhibits the enhanced phosphorylation of cofilin and MYPT1, respectively, with dose-dependent effects.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Cdc42
  • Deafness
  • Stereocilia
  • Hair cell
  • Apical junctional complex
  • Actin turnover
  • FRET

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Maintenance of stereocilia and apical junctional complexes by Cdc42 in cochlear hair cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Maintenance of stereocilia and apical junctional complexes by Cdc42 in cochlear hair cells
Takehiko Ueyama, Hirofumi Sakaguchi, Takashi Nakamura, Akihiro Goto, Shigefumi Morioka, Aya Shimizu, Kazuki Nakao, Yoshitaka Hishikawa, Yuzuru Ninoyu, Hidetoshi Kassai, Shiro Suetsugu, Takehiko Koji, Bernd Fritzsch, Shigenobu Yonemura, Yasuo Hisa, Michiyuki Matsuda, Atsu Aiba, Naoaki Saito
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 2040-2052; doi: 10.1242/jcs.143602
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Maintenance of stereocilia and apical junctional complexes by Cdc42 in cochlear hair cells
Takehiko Ueyama, Hirofumi Sakaguchi, Takashi Nakamura, Akihiro Goto, Shigefumi Morioka, Aya Shimizu, Kazuki Nakao, Yoshitaka Hishikawa, Yuzuru Ninoyu, Hidetoshi Kassai, Shiro Suetsugu, Takehiko Koji, Bernd Fritzsch, Shigenobu Yonemura, Yasuo Hisa, Michiyuki Matsuda, Atsu Aiba, Naoaki Saito
Journal of Cell Science 2014 127: 2040-2052; doi: 10.1242/jcs.143602

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • PDZD8 mediated lipid transfer at ER-LE/lys contacts is required for LE/lys positioning and neurite outgrowth
  • Acidic microenvironment modulates ROR1 to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition and hepatocarcinoma metastasis
  • Vacuolar protein Tag1 and Atg1–Atg13 regulate autophagy termination during persistent starvation in S. cerevisiae
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Cell scientist to watch: Janet Iwasa

Read our interview with molecular animator Janet Iwasa, where she talks about her transition from the wet lab, explains how animation can facilitate research and discusses the challenges of the field.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Mole – The Corona files

“Despite everything, it's just incredible that we get to do science.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992