Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
Sphingolipids inhibit vimentin-dependent cell migration
Claire L. Hyder, Kati Kemppainen, Kimmo O. Isoniemi, Susumu Y. Imanishi, Hidemasa Goto, Masaki Inagaki, Elnaz Fazeli, John E. Eriksson, Kid Törnquist
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 2057-2069; doi: 10.1242/jcs.160341
Claire L. Hyder
1Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, POB 123, FIN-20521, Turku, Finland
2Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6A, FI-20520, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kati Kemppainen
2Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6A, FI-20520, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimmo O. Isoniemi
1Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, POB 123, FIN-20521, Turku, Finland
2Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6A, FI-20520, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susumu Y. Imanishi
1Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, POB 123, FIN-20521, Turku, Finland
3Environmental Science Lab, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, Yagotoyama 150, Tempaku. Nagoya 468-8503, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hidemasa Goto
4Division of Biochemistry, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
5Department of Cellular Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Showa-Ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masaki Inagaki
4Division of Biochemistry, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
5Department of Cellular Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Showa-Ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elnaz Fazeli
2Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6A, FI-20520, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John E. Eriksson
1Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, POB 123, FIN-20521, Turku, Finland
2Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6A, FI-20520, Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.eriksson@abo.fi ktornqvi@abo.fi
Kid Törnquist
2Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6A, FI-20520, Turku, Finland
6Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Biomedicum Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.eriksson@abo.fi ktornqvi@abo.fi
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    S1P and SPC inhibit migration and induce vimentin phosphorylation at S71. (A) Sphingolipid treatment dramatically inhibits chemotactic MDA-MB-435S cell migration. Cells were allowed to migrate in Boyden chambers towards 10% lipid-stripped serum and vehicle control (C), S1P (15 nM) or SPC (700 nM) for 16 h. Results are mean±s.e.m., n=6–7. (B) Sphingolipid treatment dramatically inhibits chemotactic C643 cell migration. Cells were allowed to migrate in Boyden chambers towards 10% lipid-stripped serum and vehicle control (C), S1P (100 nM) or SPC (10 μM) for 6 h. Results are mean±s.e.m., n=4–6. (C) Sphingolipid treatment impairs C643 scrape wound healing. Cells were grown to a monolayer. A scratch wound was made. Initial images were taken using the Incucyte ZOOM and the cells were treated with S1P (100 nM), SPC (10 µM) or their respective controls. The wounds were made prior to treatment because sphingolipid treatment causes a temporary rounding of the cells which would be detrimental for imaging of the initial wound. Wound closure was followed for 20 h and images were taken every hour. Relative wound density was calculated by the Incucyte ZOOM software and represents the density of the wound at the indicated time points compared to the initial wound. Graph shows quantification of relative wound density, mean±s.e.m., n=3. (D) LC-MS/MS analysis of a vimentin phosphorylation site induced by SPC and S1P in MDA-MB-435S cells. Cells were treated with vehicle control, S1P (100 nM, 30 min) or SPC (1 µM, 1 h). After in-gel tryptic digestion and TiO2 phosphopeptide enrichment, a peptide L69RpSSVPGVR77 (pS71) was identified as a vimentin phosphopeptide induced by both the sphingolipids (refer to supplementary material Fig. S1; supplementary material Table S1). To validate the phosphorylation site, MS/MS spectra of pS71, pS72 and the non-phosphorylated form of the peptide were comparatively interpreted. These peptides were observed in all the four samples (S1P, SPC and respective control samples), and representative MS/MS spectra are shown here. A neutral loss of phosphoric acid (-P) was observed at the phosphorylated serine residues. (E) Validation of vimentin S6, S38 and S71 phosphorylation induced by sphingolipid treatment in MDA-MB-435S cells. Western blot analysis and quantification using phosphosite-specific antibodies shows that only phosphorylation of vimentin S71 (pS71-Vim) is significantly induced following treatment of MDA-MB-435S cells with S1P (100 nM, 30 min) or with SPC (10 µM, 1 h). (F) The graphs show quantification of the results in E (mean±s.e.m., n=3–5). *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 between sphingolipid treatment and vehicle control (C) [Student's t-test (A,B), two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-hoc test (C) or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-hoc test (F)].

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Sphingolipids S1P and SPC cause vimentin reorganisation. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing that sphingolipid treatment causes cell rounding and reorganisation of the vimentin and actin cytoskeleton in C643 cells. Cells were co-labelled for vimentin (magenta) and actin using fluorescently conjugated phalloidin (green). White squares on the vimentin images indicate the area of the magnified images shown in the inset. Scale bars: 20 μm (main images); 5 µm (inset). (B) 3D projections of confocal stacks of whole-cell-stained (CFSE) C643 cells show rounding effects of S1P and SPC treatment. Cells grown on coverslips were labelled with CFSE and treated with vehicle control (C), S1P (100 nM) or SPC (1 μM) for 30 min. Cells were fixed and CFSE stain was imaged with confocal microscope. 3D surface rendering projections were created with BioImageXD. (C) S1P and SPC decrease the cell perimeter and S1P decreases cell volume. The 3D image stacks described in B were segmented to identify whole cells using BioImageXD. Cell volumes were measured from six stacks per treatment in two separate experiments (minimum 300 cells per treatment). The length of the cell perimeter was measured with CellProfiler. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (Student's t-test).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Kinetics of S1P- and SPC-induced vimentin S71 phosphorylation. MDA-MB-435S and C643 cells were treated with S1P (100 nM) or SPC (10 µM) for the times indicated and then the phosphorylation of vimentin S71 was analysed by western blotting. Results are mean±s.e.m., n=3. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 between sphingolipid treatment and vehicle control (C) (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-hoc test).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    S1P and SPC act through S1P2 to phosphorylate vimentin and inhibit cell migration. (A) Knockdown of S1P2 prevents S1P- and SPC-induced vimentin S71 phosphorylation. MDA-MB-435S cells transfected with siControl or siS1P2 were treated with vehicle control (C), S1P (100 nM, 10 min) or SPC (10 µM, 1 h). Results are mean±s.e.m., n=5. (B) Inhibition of S1P2 prevents S1P- and SPC-induced vimentin S71 phosphorylation (pS71-Vim). MDA-MB-435S cells were pre-treated with the S1P2 inhibitor JTE013 (10 µM, 1 h) and then treated with vehicle control (C), S1P (100 nM, 10 min) or SPC (10 µM, 1 h). Results are mean±s.e.m., n=3. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images showing S1P2 inhibition with JTE013 prevents S1P and SPC induced cell rounding and reorganisation of vimentin in MDA-MB-435S cells. Cells were pre-treated with JTE013 (10 µM, 1 h) as indicated before treatment with vehicle control (CON), S1P (100 nM, 30 min) or SPC (1 µM, 1 h). Cells were co-labelled for vimentin (magenta) and actin using fluorescently conjugated phalloidin (green). Scale bars: 20 μm. (D) Single-cell tracking shows that S1P and SPC inhibits the movement of MDA-MB-435S cells which is rescued by S1P2 inhibition. Cells were treated with vehicle control (C), S1P (100 nM) or SPC (1 µM) and JTE013 (10 µM) combined (S1P or SPC +JTE; plots for JTE alone not shown). Plots show the tracks of 60 randomly selected cells from three independent experiments. Cells were tracked for 6 h and wide-field images were obtained every 45 min. The intersection of the x- and y-axis is the starting point for each cell. (E) S1P and SPC inhibit velocity of MDA-MB-435S movement and this is rescued by S1P2 inhibition. Graph shows the velocity of the cells tracked in D. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-hoc test (A,B,E) or Student's t-test (A)).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    S1P and SPC act through ROCK to induce vimentin phosphorylation at S71, cause vimentin reorganisation and inhibit cell movement. (A) Inhibition of ROCK prevents S1P- and SPC-induced vimentin S71 phosphorylation (pS71-Vim). MDA-MB-435S cells were pre-treated with ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (10 µM, 1 h) and treated with vehicle control (C), S1P (100 nM, 10 min) or SPC (10 µM, 1 h). Whole-cell lysates were prepared and used for western blotting. Results are mean±s.e.m., n=3. (B) ROCK inhibition with Y27632 prevents the S1P- and SPC-induced cell rounding and perinuclear reorganisation of vimentin in MDA-MB-435S cells. Cells were pre-treated with Y27632 (10 µM, overnight) as indicated before treatment with vehicle control (C), S1P (100 nM, 30 min) or SPC (1 µM, 1 h). Cells were co-labelled for vimentin (magenta) and actin using fluorescently-conjugated phalloidin (green). Scale bars: 20 μm. (C) S1P and SPC inhibit the movement of MDA-MB-435S cells which is rescued by ROCK inhibition. Cells were treated with vehicle control (C), S1P (100 nM) or SPC (1 µM) and Y27632 (10 µM) combined (S1P or SPC+Y2763, plots for Y27632 alone not shown). Plots show the tracks of 60 randomly selected cells from three independent experiments. Cells were tracked for 6 h and wide-field images were obtained every 45 min using Cell-IQ. The intersection of the x- and y-axis is the starting point for each cell. (D) S1P and SPC inhibit velocity of MDA-MB-435S and this is attenuated by ROCK inhibition. Graph shows the velocity of the cells tracked in C). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-hoc test).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Vimentin is important for the inhibitory effects of sphingolipids on cell migration. (A) Sphingolipids induce vimentin S71 phosphorylation (pS71-Vim) in WT MEFs. Cells were treated with S1P (100 nM) or SPC (10 µM) for the times indicated and phosphorylation of vimentin S71 was analysed by western blotting. Images shown are representative of three separate experiments. (B) Sphingolipid treatment inhibits chemotactic migration in WT MEFs but not in vimentin KO MEFs. Cells were allowed to migrate in Boyden chambers towards 10% lipid-stripped serum and vehicle control (C), S1P (10 nM) or SPC (1 μM). Results are mean±s.e.m., n=5. (C) Western blot to show vimentin levels in the vimentin WT and KO MEFs. (D) Expression of the unphosphorylatable S71A vimentin mutant in MDA-MB-435S cells attenuates the inhibitory effect of S1P and SPC on chemotactic cell migration. Cells were double transfected with mCherry–vimentin plasmids and migration experiments were performed as described in Fig. 1A. Results are mean±s.e.m., n=3. (E) Western blot to show the representative protein levels of mCherry–vimentin empty vector (EV), mCherry–vimentin WT and the unphosphorylatable mCherry–vimentin S71A mutant (S71A) compared to the endogenous vimentin levels in MDA-MB-435S cells. (F) Representative immunofluorescence images of the cells expressing the vectors described in E in MDA-MB-435S cells. Co-labelling with fluorescently conjugated phalloidin was used to indicate cell shape. Scale bars: 20 μm. (G) Graphs showing the percentage of transfected cells for each of the vectors. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-hoc test).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Sphingolipids have the capacity to regulate migration by activation of S1P2 and ROCK-mediated vimentin S71 phosphorylation. See text for more details.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • S1P
  • SPC
  • Vimentin
  • Rock
  • Phosphorylation
  • Sphingosine 1-phosphate
  • Sphingosylphosphorylcholine
  • Migration
  • S1P2
  • S1PR2
  • Intermediate filament

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sphingolipids inhibit vimentin-dependent cell migration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Sphingolipids inhibit vimentin-dependent cell migration
Claire L. Hyder, Kati Kemppainen, Kimmo O. Isoniemi, Susumu Y. Imanishi, Hidemasa Goto, Masaki Inagaki, Elnaz Fazeli, John E. Eriksson, Kid Törnquist
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 2057-2069; doi: 10.1242/jcs.160341
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Sphingolipids inhibit vimentin-dependent cell migration
Claire L. Hyder, Kati Kemppainen, Kimmo O. Isoniemi, Susumu Y. Imanishi, Hidemasa Goto, Masaki Inagaki, Elnaz Fazeli, John E. Eriksson, Kid Törnquist
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 2057-2069; doi: 10.1242/jcs.160341

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Histone chaperone APLF level dictates the implantation of mouse embryos
  • Switching between blebbing and lamellipodia depends on the degree of non-muscle myosin II activity
  • Kindlin-2 promotes rear focal adhesion disassembly and directional persistence during cell migration
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992