Advertisement
Research Article
JNK2 controls fragmentation of the Golgi complex and the G2/M transition through phosphorylation of GRASP65
Romina Ines Cervigni, Raffaella Bonavita, Maria Luisa Barretta, Daniela Spano, Inmaculada Ayala, Nobuhiro Nakamura, Daniela Corda, Antonino Colanzi
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 2249-2260; doi: 10.1242/jcs.164871

ABSTRACT

In mammalian cells, the Golgi complex is composed of stacks that are connected by membranous tubules. During G2, the Golgi complex is disassembled into isolated stacks. This process is required for entry into mitosis, indicating that the correct inheritance of the organelle is monitored by a ‘Golgi mitotic checkpoint’. However, the regulation and the molecular mechanisms underlying this Golgi disassembly are still poorly understood. Here, we show that JNK2 has a crucial role in the G2-specific separation of the Golgi stacks through phosphorylation of Ser277 of the Golgi-stacking protein GRASP65 (also known as GORASP1). Inhibition of JNK2 by RNA interference or by treatment with three unrelated JNK inhibitors causes a potent and persistent cell cycle block in G2. JNK activity becomes dispensable for mitotic entry if the Golgi complex is disassembled by brefeldin A treatment or by GRASP65 depletion. Finally, measurement of the Golgi fluorescence recovery after photobleaching demonstrates that JNK is required for the cleavage of the tubules connecting Golgi stacks. Our findings reveal that a JNK2–GRASP65 signalling axis has a crucial role in coupling Golgi inheritance and G2/M transition.

INTRODUCTION

The Golgi complex is well known for its central role in the processing and transport of proteins and lipids. In mammalian cells, the Golgi complex is organised in the form of stacks that are connected by tubular membranes, thus forming a continuous membranous structure that is referred to as the ‘Golgi ribbon’ (Shorter and Warren, 2002). During cell division the Golgi complex undergoes a multistep disassembly process that facilitates its distribution into the daughter cells (Lowe and Barr, 2007). The preparatory step for this segregation is the G2-specific cleavage of the tubular membranes connecting the stacks (Golgi ‘unlinking’) (Colanzi et al., 2007; Feinstein and Linstedt, 2007). Then, during mitosis, the stacks are fragmented into dispersed vesicles and tubulo-vesicular clusters, which are then partitioned between the daughter cells (Wei and Seemann, 2009).

The G2-specific Golgi unlinking has great functional significance as its inhibition results in cell cycle arrest in G2 (Sutterlin et al., 2002; Carcedo et al., 2004; Yoshimura et al., 2005) or in a delay of G2/M transition (Feinstein and Linstedt, 2007), depending on the experimental approach (Cervigni et al., 2011). Therefore, the partitioning of the Golgi complex is a necessary event for the cell to enter into mitosis, indicating that a ‘Golgi checkpoint’ can sense the integrity of the Golgi complex. A block of Golgi partitioning impairs G2/M transition through the inhibition of centrosome recruitment and activation of the mitotic kinase Aurora-A (Persico et al., 2010). Moreover, MEK-dependent inhibition of the Golgi-localised mitotic kinase Myt1 promotes early entry into mitosis (Villeneuve et al., 2013). Thus, these findings have highlighted the regulatory interplay between organelle inheritance and the signalling pathways that regulate cell division.

The unlinking of the Golgi ribbon in G2 is controlled by the protein CtBP1 (also known as, and hereafter referred to as BARS) (Colanzi et al., 2007) and by the Golgi stacking factors GRASP55 (also known as GORASP2) and GRASP65 (also known as GORASP1) (Lee et al., 2014). In this context, BARS stimulates the fission-mediated cleavage of the tubules that connect the stacks of the Golgi ribbon (Carcedo et al., 2004; Corda et al., 2006; Colanzi et al., 2007), and GRASP55 and GRASP65 are involved in the maintenance of the ribbon structure (Puthenveedu and Linstedt, 2004; Sutterlin et al., 2005; Tang et al., 2012; Jarvela and Linstedt, 2014). GRASP55 and GRASP65 act as membrane tethers through their conserved N-terminal halves, each of which contains two PDZ domains (the ‘GRASP domain’). The more N-terminal PDZ domain of GRASP55 and GRASP65 can homodimerise in trans with the second PDZ domain of another molecule of GRASP55 and GRASP65, respectively. This homotypic trans-oligomerisation is required for the formation of the Golgi stacks, and also for the ‘lateral’ connections between homotypic cisternae to promote the formation of the Golgi ribbon. The trans-oligomerisation is inhibited by phosphorylation events at the C-terminal halves of these proteins (for a review, see Vinke et al., 2011).

GRASP55-dependent Golgi-linking is under the control of the RAF–MEK–ERK kinase module in a protein kinase D (PKD)-dependent manner (Feinstein and Linstedt, 2007, 2008; Duran et al., 2008; Truschel et al., 2012; Kienzle et al., 2013). However, although depletion of PKD1 and PKD2 leads to the accumulation of cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle (Kienzle et al., 2013), chemical inhibition of MEK induces only a kinetic delay of G2/M transition (Feinstein and Linstedt, 2007), indicating that additional signalling pathways could control the Golgi unlinking process.

Less is known about the regulation of the tethering function of GRASP65 in the ribbon formation and/or maintenance during G2. During mitosis GRASP65 is phosphorylated by CDK1 at a total of four serine/threonine residues (Ser216 or Ser217, Thr220, Ser277 and Ser376), which leads to a complete disassembly of the Golgi stacks (Barr et al., 1997; Lin et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2003; Preisinger et al., 2005; Yoshimura et al., 2005). In addition, GRASP65 is also phosphorylated by PLK1 at Ser189 (Preisinger et al., 2005; Sengupta and Linstedt, 2010; Truschel et al., 2012). However, this PLK1 action requires the priming phosphorylation of GRASP65 by a yet-to-be-identified kinase (Sengupta and Linstedt, 2010).

Among these phosphorylated residues, Ser277 phosphorylation is strongly increased during the G2 phase of the cell cycle (Tang et al., 2012). Thus, we have focused on the hypothesis that phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 is a key regulator of Golgi unlinking and that this phosphorylation is carried out through a signalling pathway that does not involve ERK1/2 (also known as MAPK3 and MAPK1, respectively) and CDK1. Indeed, our data show that during G2, GRASP65-Ser277 is exclusively phosphorylated by JNK2. Furthermore, this JNK2-mediated phosphorylation has a crucial role in Golgi unlinking in G2, and hence in the entry of cells into mitosis as JNK inhibitors causes a potent and persistent cell cycle block in G2. Collectively, our findings reveal a new role for this JNK2–GRASP65 axis in coupling Golgi unlinking and G2/M transition. An understanding of how Golgi unlinking is regulated is a key step towards the unravelling of novel regulatory mechanisms in cell cycle progression.

RESULTS

The role of phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 in Golgi structure and cell entry into mitosis

To study the role of GRASP65-Ser277 phosphorylation during G2, we generated Flag-tagged vectors for the overexpression of the regulatory domain of GRASP65 (i.e. the SPR domain, denoted GRASP65Δ200) (Sutterlin et al., 2002) and a mutant where the Ser277 of GRASP65 was replaced by alanine (Ser277Ala-GRASP65Δ200). HeLa cells were seeded on glass coverslips and synchronised in S-phase using a double-thymidine block (Colanzi et al., 2007). To induce an ‘acute’ functional block of GRASP65, the cells were transfected with Flag–GRASP65Δ200 and Flag–Ser277Ala-GRASP65Δ200 1 h after the release of the S-phase block by thymidine washout, and they were processed for immunofluorescence and western blotting at the mitotic peak (12 h after S-phase release) (Fig. 1A). Confocal microscopy analysis of the non-mitotic cells, which are mostly in G2 (Colanzi et al., 2007), showed that the structure of the Golgi complex was significantly more compact in cells overexpressing GRASP65Δ200 with respect to both the cells overexpressing Ser277Ala-GRASP65Δ200 and the control non-transfected cells on the same coverslip (Fig. 1B,C). This indicates that the effect of Flag–GRASP65Δ200 on Golgi morphology is crucially dependent on the phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 (Fig. 1B,C). Moreover, western blotting showed that a fraction of Flag–GRASP65Δ200 had a reduced electrophoretic mobility compared to the non-phosphorylatable mutant (Fig. 1D), in line with the phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 (Wang et al., 2003; Yoshimura et al., 2005).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Overexpression of GRASP65Δ200 induces Golgi compaction and blocks entry into mitosis. (A) Experimental scheme. HeLa cells were grown on coverslips and arrested in S phase using a double-thymidine block. At 1 h after the second thymidine washout, the cells were transfected with GRASP65Δ200 (Δ200-wt) and with the mutated S277A-GRASP65Δ200 (Δ200-S277A), and fixed at the mitotic peak. (B) Representative images of HeLa cells treated as in A, as indicated. The cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence with anti-Flag and anti-GM130 antibodies for Golgi staining. The inset images show an enlargement of dashed boxes for GM130. Scale bars: 20 μm. (C) Quantification of HeLa cells treated as in B, through counting of intact Golgi in the transfected cells. More than 200 cells were analysed for each condition. Data are means±s.d. from three independent experiments. ***P<0.001 versus S277A-GRASP65Δ200-transfected cells (Student's t-tests). (D) Representative cell immunoblotting with antibodies against Flag, to show the mobility shift between the two transfected constructs. (E) Quantification of the mitotic index of HeLa cells grown on coverslips and arrested in S phase using the double-thymidine block, and transfected with GRASP65Δ200 or with S277A-GRASP65Δ200 after the second thymidine washout. At 3 h before fixing, 200 ng/ml BFA or 500 ng/ml nocodazole (as indicated) were added. The cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33342 for nuclei staining. Counting was normalised to non-transfected cells on the same coverslip. More than 200 cells were analysed for each condition. Data are means±s.d. from three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate. ***P=0.0015, **P=0.0031 versus non-treated, GRASP65Δ200-transfected cells (Student's t-test).

Next, we determined whether the expression of these constructs affected cell entry into mitosis. HeLa cells were treated as above and, 3 h prior to fixing the cells, some of the samples were treated with either brefeldin A (BFA) or nocodazole, to induce the artificial break-up of the Golgi complex, and thus to bypass the Golgi checkpoint (Persico et al., 2010) (Fig. 1E). Transfection of Flag–GRASP65Δ200 resulted in ∼60% inhibition of the mitotic index compared to non-transfected cells, whereas the transfection of Flag–Ser277Ala-GRASP65Δ200 did not result in any alteration in the mitotic index normalised to the non-transfected cells (Fig. 1E). As evidence that Flag–GRASP65Δ200 blocks entry into mitosis as a consequence of inhibition of Golgi fragmentation, the overexpression of Flag–GRASP65Δ200 did not affect entry into mitosis in cells where the Golgi had been artificially disrupted by the BFA or nocodazole treatments (Carcedo et al., 2004) (Fig. 1E). Thus, these data show that Flag-GRASP65Δ200 impairs entry into mitosis only when Ser277 can be phosphorylated, which reveals an important role for this residue in regulating the G2/M transition.

During G2, GRASP65-Ser277 is exclusively phosphorylated by JNK family kinases

Next, to identify the kinase involved in the phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277, we tested a set of candidates based on the surrounding sequence of GRASP65-Ser277, Px(S/T)P, which matches the consensus sequence for the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK1/2, the p38 family kinases (hereafter denoted p38) and JNK family kinases (hereafter denoted JNK), and for the mitotic kinase CDK1. HeLa cells were subjected to the double-thymidine cell cycle synchronisation protocol. At 10 h after S-phase block release, the cells were treated for 2 h with dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO; as control), or with an inhibitor of each of JNK (SP600125), MEK1 (also known as MAP2K1; U0126), p38 (SB203580) and CDK1 (RO3306). The cells were then fixed and processed for immunofluorescence. The samples were stained with a well-characterised phosphorylation-specific antibody against phosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277 (Fig. 2A) (Yoshimura et al., 2005). Cells in late G2 were identified as having duplicated and separated centrosomes and uncondensed DNA (Persico et al., 2010) (Fig. 2B). Importantly, more than 90% of this G2 cell population showed clear staining of phosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277 at the Golgi complex in control cells (Fig. 2B,C, Ctrl). The treatment of the cells with the inhibitors of MEK1, p38 and CDK1 did not modify the fraction of cells positive for phosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277. By contrast, the treatment with the JNK inhibitor caused a more than 80% reduction in the fraction of cells with detectable levels of phosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277 (Fig. 2B,C), which revealed that JNK has a crucial role in this phosphorylation.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Inhibition of JNK reduces phosphorylation of GRASP65 during G2. (A,B) Representative images of S phase (A) and G2 (A,B) HeLa cells stained for phosphosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277 (pS277), for DNA with Hoechst 33342, and either for GM130 to identify the Golgi complex (A), or for pericentrin (B) to identify the centrosome without and with treatments for 2 h with the indicated inhibitors: JNK (50 μM SP600125), MEK1 (20 μM U0126), p38 (10 μM SB203580) and CDK1 (9 μM RO3306). (B) The G2 cells show the combined features of non-condensed DNA and contemporary separation of centrosomes. Scale bars: 10 μm. (C) Quantification of cells positive for phosphosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277 (pS277) in G2 and treated with the indicated inhibitors. Data are means+s.d., from three independent experiments, each carried out in duplicate. *P<0.05 versus DMSO (Ctrl) treated cells (Student's t-test).

To confirm this finding using an independent approach we used two additional structurally unrelated JNK inhibitors (JNK inhibitors VIII and III; Gao et al., 2013) to monitor GRASP65-Ser277 phosphorylation in NRK cells. These cells were arrested in S phase using an aphidicolin block. At 6 h after S-phase block release, the cells were either treated with DMSO (as control) or treated for 2 h with inhibitor VIII, inhibitor III or SP600125. Western blotting of cell lysates showed that treatment with each of these three JNK inhibitors resulted in a strong decrease in the phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 (Fig. 3A, upper panel). Importantly, JNK activity did not show an increased activation during G2/M (supplementary material Fig. S1A,B), but treatment with the three JNK inhibitors caused a complete inhibition of the phosphorylation of c-Jun, which is an established reporter of JNK activity (Fig. 3A, lower panel). Thus, collectively, these data show that the phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 during G2 is mediated by JNK signalling. In addition, in cells arrested in mitosis by nocodazole treatment, inhibiting either JNK or CDK1 could also reduce the phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 (supplementary material Fig. S1C).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

JNK inhibition reduces phosphorylation of GRASP65 and blocks Golgi fragmentation in G2. (A–C) NRK cells were synchronised in S-phase with aphidicolin and 6 h after S-phase release (G2 phase) they were treated with JNK inhibitors VIII (2 μM), III (5 μM) and SP600125 (50 μM) for 2 h. The cells were either lysed (A) or fixed (B). (A) GRASP65 and phosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277 (pS277) expression were analysed in the absence (Ctrl) and presence (as indicated) of the JNK inhibitors, as seen in this representative western blot of the total cell lysate; anti-GRASP65 antibody staining acts as a loading control. The efficacy of the inhibitors was also monitored, using anti-phospho-c-Jun and anti-c-Jun antibodies (as indicated). (B) The fixed cells were labelled with the anti-GM130 antibody to monitor organisation of Golgi membranes. Representative images of fragmented Golgi in G2 and of compact Golgi in cells treated with the JNK inhibitor SP600125. Scale bars: 5 μm. (C) Quantification of cells treated as in B, for compact, partially fragmented, and fragmented Golgi. Data are means from three independent experiments, with 200 cells counted per condition. The reduction in the fragmented Golgi of cells treated with the JNK inhibitors compared to the control (Ctrl) was statistically significant (P<0.01, Student's t-tests). (D,E) Representative NRK cells (D) and their quantification (E) (as in C), after treatment for 20 h with the CDK1 inhibitor RO3306 to induce G2 accumulation; 1 h or 4 h prior to fixing, the cells were additionally treated with JNK inhibitor SP600125, MEK1 inhibitor U0126 (20 μM U0126) and PLK1 inhibitor BI2536 (100 nM BI2536). Cells were fixed and labelled with the anti-GM130 antibody to monitor organisation of Golgi membranes. Data are means (±s.d. for fragmented Golgi) from three independent experiments, with 200 cells counted per condition. The reduction of the fragmented Golgi of cells treated with the JNK inhibitors compared to control (Ctrl) was statistically significant (P<0.01, Student's t-test).

Inhibition of the JNK pathway blocks cleavage of the Golgi ribbon during G2

Having established that JNK mediates phosphorylation of GRASP65 during G2, we investigated whether inhibition of JNK affects the Golgi morphology. NRK cells were synchronised as described above and, 2 h before fixation, the cells were treated with DMSO (as control) or with each of the three JNK inhibitors. The samples were scored by confocal analysis according to three phenotypes that were based on the structure of the Golgi complex: compact, partially fragmented, and fragmented, as previously described (Colanzi et al., 2007) (Fig. 3B,C). A compact Golgi appears rounded and in a perinuclear location. A fragmented Golgi appears to be distributed over a wider area and shows breaks that are the consequence of the loss of the connections between the Golgi stacks. A partially fragmented phenotype describes an intermediate condition that cannot be attributed to either of the other two phenotypes. Importantly, all of the three JNK inhibitors induced strong increases in the fraction of cells with a compact Golgi complex: from 23.6% in the control, to 68.9%, 79.4% and 74.7% in cells treated with JNK inhibitors VIII, III and SP600125, respectively (Fig. 3C). These data show that JNK has a key role in the regulation of the Golgi organisation.

We also tested whether the JNK inhibitors are able to induce the formation of a compact Golgi morphology in G2-arrested cells. NRK cells were arrested in G2 using a 20-h treatment with the CDK1 inhibitor RO3306 (Vassilev, 2006). The G2-arrested cells were also treated for 1 h and 4 h prior to fixing, with DMSO (control), with a JNK inhibitor (SP600125) and with inhibitors of MEK1 (U0126) and PLK1 (BI2536), which are two kinases involved in the regulation of Golgi structure (Lin et al., 2000; Feinstein and Linstedt, 2007; Villeneuve et al., 2013). Finally, the cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy. In the control, ∼70% of the cells had an unlinked Golgi complex, with only a minor fraction with a compact Golgi morphology (Fig. 3D,E). Importantly, JNK inhibition induced a significant increase in the compact Golgi cell population (from 6.5% to 56%), with a consequent decrease in the proportion of cells with fragmented Golgi (from 72% to 24%) (Fig. 3E). Interestingly, PLK1 inhibition also induced a detectable increase in the proportion of the cells with compact Golgi morphology, although to a lesser extent (from 6.5% to 22%), along with an increase in the partially fragmented form (from 21.5% to 43.5%). However, MEK1 inhibition induced a modest increase in the proportion of cells with compact Golgi morphology (Fig. 3E). In line with these findings, live imaging of G2/M-enriched cells showed that inhibition of JNK can induce the Golgi membranes to assume a more compact organisation (supplementary material Movie 1). As a control, in G2-blocked cells the Golgi elements became highly dynamic and underwent several aggregation and dissociation events (supplementary material Movie 2).

Next, we asked whether Golgi fragmentation can be reversed in cells that have a fragmented Golgi and that, for this feature, could bypass the Golgi checkpoint. Thus, we examined the effect of JNK inhibition in MCF7 cells, which is a tumour cell line known to have a fragmented Golgi (Kellokumpu et al., 2002) and that requires JNK signalling for its proliferation (Mingo-Sion et al., 2004), as confirmed by their higher JNK activity compared to HeLa cells (supplementary material Fig. S2A). By confocal analysis, the Golgi complex in MCF7 is fragmented into scattered elements (supplementary material Fig. S2B, DMSO). Importantly, the addition of the JNK inhibitor induced reformation of a ribbon-like Golgi complex (supplementary material Fig. S2B, SP600125).

Finally, to determine whether the compact Golgi morphology corresponds to a continuous membranous system, we investigated the Golgi ribbon integrity through analysis of the diffusion-mediated process of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of Golgi-resident enzymes (Cole et al., 1996; Lippincott-Schwartz and Patterson, 2003). Golgi enzymes diffuse along the length of the Golgi ribbon, as shown previously by their fast FRAP (Cole et al., 1996). However, during G2, when the tubular connections between adjacent Golgi stacks are severed, there is reduced diffusion of these enzymes between the Golgi stacks, as reported previously (Colanzi et al., 2007).

HeLa cells were transfected with galactosyl transferase fused to GFP (GalT–GFP) and subjected to the double-thymidine synchronisation protocol. The GalT–GFP FRAP was then evaluated in a G2-enriched cell population that was represented by the non-mitotic cells 9 h after thymidine washout (Colanzi et al., 2007). Prior to the FRAP, the cells were treated for 2 h with DMSO (control) or the JNK inhibitor VIII. Then, a region corresponding to approximately half of the Golgi complex was bleached by laser illumination, and the FRAP of GalT–GFP was examined (Fig. 4A). In the control G2 cells, the FRAP of GalT–GFP (normalised to the unbleached areas) was partial and slow, which is consistent with a broken Golgi ribbon (Colanzi et al., 2007). In contrast, in cells treated with the JNK inhibitor, the GalT–GFP FRAP was greater and faster (Fig. 4B,C), which indicated that inhibition of JNK led to the maintenance of a continuous Golgi ribbon in these G2 cells.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Inhibition of JNK affects Golgi ribbon unlinking in G2. HeLa cells synchronised with the double-thymidine treatment and transfected with GalT–GFP were released from the S-phase block and treated with 2 μM of the JNK inhibitor VIII for 2 h (until G2/M peak) and subjected to FRAP analysis after bleaching about 50% of the Golgi mass. (A) Representative images illustrating the Golgi complex before (Pre-bleached), directly after bleaching at t=0 s (Bleach) and after recovery (200 s). The bleached areas are delineated by the dotted rectangles. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Distribution of the cells without (CTRL) and with JNK inhibitor VIII treatment according to t½, to compare relative recovery rates. (C) Time courses of normalised FRAP kinetics of cells as in B. Fluorescence recovery in the bleached areas was monitored every 10 s. Curves of fluorescence were normalised to the non-bleached area, by subtraction of the background over the time. Data are means±s.e.m. of three independent experiments (10 cells per sample, per experiment).

The JNK-mediated effect on Golgi structure is mediated through phosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277

We next examined whether JNK-dependent Golgi fragmentation is mediated by phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277. HeLa cells were transfected with a control non-targeting small-interfering (si)RNA or with a GRASP65-specific siRNA, for 72 h. Western blotting revealed that the GRASP65 levels were reduced by ∼70% (Fig. 5A). The cells were then synchronised using the double-thymidine protocol, and endogenous GRASP65 was replaced with Myc-tagged and siRNA-resistant wild-type (wt) or phospho-depleted (Ser277Ala-GRASP65) constructs. Finally, the cells were stained with anti-GM130 and anti-Myc antibodies. The numbers of cells with the fragmented Golgi phenotype were quantified in the absence and presence of the JNK inhibitor SP600125 (Fig. 5B). As most of the cells were in G2, ∼60% of the control non-targeting cells showed a fragmented Golgi, and this was slightly greater with the GRASP65 knockdown (∼70%). As expected, addition of the JNK inhibitor SP600125 reduced the fraction of cells with fragmented Golgi in control cells (Fig. 5C, NT+SP), but in striking contrast, this failed to restore the Golgi integrity in cells knocked down for GRASP65 (Fig. 5C, siGR65+SP). This suggested that GRASP65 is a major effector of the JNK-mediated effects on the Golgi structure. In line with this hypothesis, transfection with the siRNA-resistant wt-GRASP65 restored the induction of compaction of the Golgi complex by SP600125 in GRASP65 knocked-down cells (Fig. 5D; compare siGR65+WT with siGR65+WT+SP). Finally, the overexpression of phospho-depleted Ser277Ala-GRASP65 induced compaction of the Golgi complex in both control and GRASP65-interfered cells, and this effect was not further increased by treatment with SP600125 (Fig. 5D, compare NT+S277A with NT+S277A+SP, and siGR65+S277A with siGR65+S277A+SP). Collectively, these data indicate that prevention of GRASP65 phosphorylation recapitulates the effects of JNK inhibition and that GRASP65 is a major effector of JNK in the regulation of the structure of the Golgi complex.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 is required for G2/M Golgi fragmentation, and is downstream of JNK. (A) Extracts from HeLa cells lysed 72 h after transfection with mock (Ctrl), non-targeting (NT) and GRASP65 siRNAs, analysed by immunoblotting using anti-GRASP65 and anti-GAPDH antibodies, as indicated. (B) Quantification from cells transfected with siRNA (non-targeting, NT) or with siRNA against GRASP65 (as indicated) and synchronised at the mitotic peak with the double-thymidine treatment in presence (+) or absence (−) of the JNK inhibitor SP600125, added 6 h after the thymidine release. Under the same conditions, a functional gene replacement strategy was used (Puthenveedu et al., 2006) to compare cells expressing Myc-tagged wt-GRASP65 (WT) with cells expressing the Myc-tagged Ser277Ala-GRASP65 phospho-depleted mutant (S277A). The cells with fragmented Golgi were counted, with more than 200 cells analysed for each condition. Data are means±s.e.m. from three independent experiments. **P<0.005, ***P<0.001 versus cells not treated with the inhibitor (Student's t-test). (C,D) Representative images of control siRNA cells (NT) and cells treated with the JNK inhibitor SP600125 (SP) and synchronised as in B that were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence with GRASP65 (C), or with an anti-Myc antibody for detection of the transfected cells (D). These cells were treated with a control siRNA (non-targeting, NT; top panels) and with a GRASP65-specific siRNA for GRASP65 depletion (siGR65; bottom panels), and with an anti-GM130 antibody for Golgi staining and Hoechst 33342 to stain DNA (C,D). In D, the cells were additionally transfected with wt-GRASP65 (WT) or with the Ser277Ala-GRASP65 phospho-depleted mutant (S277A). Scale bars: 10 μm.

JNK inhibition blocks mitotic entry in a Golgi-dependent manner

Next, we asked whether JNK-dependent inhibition of Golgi fragmentation results in a block of G2/M transition. NRK cells were synchronised with aphidicolin to induce a cell cycle block at the S-phase boundary. At 4 h after aphidicolin washout, the cells were treated with each of the three JNK inhibitors (VIII, III, SP600125), and the mitotic index was analysed at several times after the S-phase block release, as previously described (Feinstein and Linstedt, 2007). Importantly, all of these three JNK inhibitors resulted in strong and persistent reduction in the mitotic index (Fig. 6A).

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

JNK inhibition blocks mitotic entry, which is rescued upon Golgi breakdown. (A) NRK cells were synchronised in S-phase with aphidicolin, with the JNK inhibitors VIII, III and SP600125 added 4 h after the S-phase block release, and at the indicated times the cells were assayed for their mitotic index. More than 300 cells were counted per condition. Data are means±s.d. from three independent experiments. (B) Representative images of NRK cells synchronised in S-phase with aphidicolin, with the JNK inhibitor SP600125 added ∼4 h after this S-phase block release, and so ∼4 h before the mitotic peak. At the same time, the cells were treated without and with BFA (200 ng/ml). The cells were labelled with the anti-GM130 antibody to monitor organisation of Golgi membranes and with Hoechst 33342 for nuclei staining, and the mitotic index was determined through the staining patterns of pH3. (C) Quantification of cells treated as in B. Around 200 cells were analysed per experiment. Data are means±s.e.m. from three independent experiments. **P<0.005, ***P<0.001 versus control cells (Student's t-test). (D) Quantification of mitotic index in HeLa cells transfected with control siRNA (NT) and the siRNA against GRASP65 (as indicated), and synchronised at the mitotic peak with the double-thymidine block, in the absence and presence of JNK inhibitor SP600125 (+JNK inhibitor) added 2 h before the mitotic peak. Data are means±s.e.m. from three independent experiments. **P=0.003 versus cells not treated with the JNK inhibitor (Student's t-test).

To determine whether inhibition of JNK blocks the cell cycle because of the activation of the Golgi checkpoint, we investigated whether the artificial fragmentation of the Golgi complex by treatment with BFA can rescue mitotic progression. Thus, synchronised NRK cells were treated with SP600125, as previously described, in the absence and presence of BFA for 4 h. The cells were then fixed and processed for fluorescence microscopy, to determine the mitotic index through the staining patterns of histone H3 phosphorylated at Ser10 (pH3) (Persico et al., 2010) (Fig. 6B). In addition, the inhibition of JNK reduced the mitotic index compared to the control cells, whereas in cells treated with BFA, the JNK inhibitor failed to promote cell cycle block (Fig. 6C).

To confirm this finding using an independent approach, we forced the Golgi complex into the form of isolated stacks by performing siRNA-mediated GRASP65 depletion (Puthenveedu et al., 2006). HeLa cells were transfected with control non-targeting siRNA or GRASP65-specific siRNA and synchronised using the double-thymidine protocol. Finally, the cells were incubated in the absence and presence of the JNK inhibitor SP600125 for 2 h prior to fixing them at the mitotic peak. Depletion of GRASP65 did not affect the overall mitotic index of these synchronised cells in comparison to the control. Importantly, the addition of SP600125 blocked the entry into mitosis for control cells, but not for the cells with an already fragmented Golgi (GRASP65-depleted) (Fig. 6D). As shown above, in MCF7 cells the Golgi is fragmented, but the treatment with JNK inhibitors induces the reformation of an intact Golgi ribbon. Thus, we tested the effect of SP600125 on the G2/M transition rate of MCF7 cells. Our results indicate that inhibition of JNK induced a remarkable inhibition of entry into mitosis (supplementary material Fig. S2C), indicating that the Golgi checkpoint can be activated also in tumour cells with a constitutively fragmented Golgi complex.

Overall, these findings establish a causal link between JNK-mediated fragmentation of the Golgi complex and cell cycle progression.

GRASP65 phosphorylation, Golgi structural changes, and cell cycle progression are regulated by JNK2

The JNK MAPK family includes the JNK1 and JNK2 subfamilies, which are ubiquitous, and the JNK3 subfamily (for a review, see Waetzig and Herdegen, 2005). As this last isoform was not detectable by western blotting and real-time quantitative PCR in HeLa cells, we excluded it from our investigation.

HeLa cells were depleted of JNK1 and JNK2 isoforms by siRNA treatments (Fig. 7A), and subjected to the double-thymidine synchronisation protocol. JNK1 depletion caused a minor reduction of the phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277. By contrast, JNK2 depletion strongly reduced this phosphorylation (Fig. 7B), suggesting that the JNK2 isoform is the one preferentially involved in the phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277. To test whether JNK2 can directly phosphorylate GRASP65-Ser277, recombinant JNK2 was incubated with the recombinant GRASP65Δ200 and the Ser277Ala-GRASP65Δ200 mutant. JNK2 phosphorylated Ser277 of GRASP65Δ200, but not the mutant (Fig. 7C). This finding agrees with the concept that the various JNK isoforms have clear substrate specificities (Bogoyevitch and Kobe, 2006), and it is also in line with previous data reporting that JNK1 cannot phosphorylate GRASP65 (Yoshimura et al., 2005).

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

JNK2 regulates Golgi fragmentation and entry into mitosis through phosphorylation of Ser277 of GRASP65. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with a non-targeting siRNA (NT) or with isoform-specific siRNAs for JNK1 (J1) or JNK2 (J2) for 72 h after, and synchronised at the G2/M peak with the double-thymidine treatment during the last 48 h. Representative western blotting for the efficacy of JNK1 and JNK2 depletion using anti-JNK1 and anti-JNK2 antibodies; anti-GAPDH antibody staining acts as a loading control. (B) Representative western blotting in total cell lysates from HeLa cells treated as in A, and analysed for phosphorylation of GRASP65 (pS277); anti-GRASP65 antibody staining acts as a loading control. (C) In vitro kinase assays were performed with purified GST–JNK2 using recombinant GST-tagged GRASP65Δ200 (S277) or the control S277A-GRASP65Δ200 (S277A) as substrates. Representative western blotting using the anti-pS277 antibody, with Ponceau Red staining as the loading control. (D) Representative images of HeLa cells treated as in A. Here, the cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence with anti-GM130 antibody to monitor the organisation of Golgi membranes and with Hoechst 33342 for nuclei staining. Scale bar: 10 μm. (E) Quantification of cells treated as in D, for compact, partially fragmented, and fragmented Golgi in control siRNA (NT) and JNK-depleted cells (as indicated). Data are means from three independent experiments, with 200 cells counted per condition. The reduction in the fragmented Golgi of the cells depleted in JNK2 compared to the control (NT) was statistically significant, (P<0.01, Student's t-tests). (F) Representative confocal images of metaphase cells depleted in the JNK isoforms (as indicated) and stained with the anti-GM130 antibody to monitor organisation of Golgi membranes and with the anti-pH3 antibody and Hoechst 33342 for nuclei staining. Scale bars: 5 μm. (G) Quantification of cells treated as in F, for the percentages of metaphase cells with clustered Golgi membranes upon treatment with control siRNA (NT) and depletion of the JNK isoforms (as indicated). Data are means+s.e.m. from three independent experiments, with ∼50 cells counted per condition. *P<0.05 versus control cells (Student's t-test).

The roles of the two JNK isoforms were then analysed in terms of the regulation of the Golgi structure. For this, HeLa cells depleted of JNK1 and JNK2 by siRNA treatments (see above) were processed for immunofluorescence using an anti-GM130 antibody to reveal the organisation of the Golgi membranes (Fig. 7D). Note that here the cells were scored according to three phenotypes, as above: for fragmented, partially fragmented, and compact Golgi structures (see Fig. 3B). This confirmed a major role for JNK2 in Golgi fragmentation, as in cells silenced for JNK2, the Golgi complex showed a more compact organisation compared to control cells (Fig. 7E). In addition, there was a 12-fold increase in the population of cells with mitotic Golgi clusters during metaphase for JNK2-depleted cells compared to non-targeting-siRNA-treated cells (Fig. 7F,G), indicating that in JNK2-depleted cells, the mitotic Golgi fragmentation was not complete. These data are supported by the observation that inhibition of JNK caused an increase in the oligomerisation state of GRASP65 (supplementary material Fig. S3).

Finally, to define the role of JNK depletion in cell cycle progression, we first checked whether a JNK isoform was localised at the Golgi complex. Interestingly, JNK2, but not JNK1, was localised at the Golgi complex (supplementary material, Fig. S4A). Then, HeLa cells that were depleted of JNK1 or JNK2 by siRNA treatments (see above) were fixed at 9 h or 13 h after the second thymidine washout (i.e. at around the mitotic peak, and after it, respectively) and processed for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (supplementary material Fig. S4B,C). In all of the samples fixed at 9 h, progression into the G2/M phase of cell cycle was not altered (supplementary material Fig. S4B). However, in the samples fixed at 13 h, although the control cells and the JNK1-depleted cells had exited mitosis, as expected, the JNK2-depleted cells had accumulated in G2/M (supplementary material Fig. S4C, bottom panel). As shown in supplementary material Fig. S4D, the depletion of JNK2 resulted in significant reduction in the mitotic index (control, 16.9%; JNK1 depletion, 13.9%; JNK2 depletion, 2.6%), which indicated that the accumulation in G2/M revealed by FACS analysis was mainly caused by G2 block of the cell cycle. Taken together, these data show that JNK2 is required for G2-specific phosphorylation of GRASP65 on Ser277, and that this phosphorylation is in turn necessary for Golgi ribbon unlinking and entry of cells into mitosis.

DISCUSSION

The main finding of this study is that a JNK2–GRASP65 signalling axis is the major regulator of Golgi ribbon organisation during G2, and of the G2/M transition of the cell cycle. Using a panel of biochemical and imaging-based assays, we have shown that JNK2 is required for phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277, and that this phosphorylation is necessary for Golgi fragmentation during the late G2 phase of the cell cycle, and for cell entry into mitosis.

The importance of the JNK2–GRASP65 signalling axis in the Golgi mitotic checkpoint is highlighted by the inhibition of JNK2 using three structurally unrelated specific inhibitors and the depletion of JNK2 by RNA interference, which resulted in inhibition of Golgi fragmentation and G2 arrest of cell cycle progression. Artificial fragmentation of the Golgi membranes by BFA or GRASP65 depletion abrogated the requirement for JNK2, which indicates that JNK2 exerts its effects on cell cycle progression through the regulation of the cleavage of the Golgi ribbon. Our data also suggest that GRASP65 is the major JNK2 target at the Golgi membranes, as the single point mutation of Ser277 to Ala can recapitulate the effects on the Golgi structure of the inhibition of JNK2. Overall, our data show that JNK-mediated phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277 has a major regulatory role in Golgi organisation during G2.

Our identification of a role for JNK2 in the Golgi mitotic checkpoint is supported by the Golgi-localisation of JNK2 itself and of possible upstream activators, such as Mekk4 (also known as MAP3K4) and MLK3 (also known as MAP3K11) (Du et al., 2005; Millarte and Farhan, 2012). In addition, in a functional screening of kinases and phosphatases, JNK2 was categorised into a group of kinases that are necessary for the regulation of cell migration in a Golgi-dependent manner (Farhan et al., 2010). Finally, several reports have shown that the JNK pathway has an important role during G2/M transition through the phosphorylation of key mitotic regulators, such as the phosphatase CDC25C and the histone H3 (MacCorkle-Chosnek et al., 2001; Lee and Song, 2008; Oktay et al., 2008; Gutierrez et al., 2010a,b). However, our results show that the JNK2–GRASP65 signalling axis has a prominent role in the regulation of G2/M transition, because even in the presence of JNK inhibitors, artificial fragmentation of the Golgi complex restores entry into mitosis.

Our findings also support the proposal that GRASP65 has a key role in maintaining the continuity of the ribbon through its capability of forming large oligomers. Although mouse embryonic fibroblasts derived from mice knocked down for GRASP65 show an apparent normal organisation of the Golgi ribbon (Veenendaal et al., 2014), probably as a result of adaptive mechanisms during embryonic development, a large body of experimental evidence has clearly proven the key role of GRASP65 in the regulation of the Golgi structure. Indeed, many experimental approaches, including depletion of GRASP65 by siRNA treatment (Puthenveedu and Linstedt, 2004; Sutterlin et al., 2005; Tang et al., 2012), or the acute depletion of GRASP65 (Jarvela and Linstedt, 2014), have shown that functional disruption of GRASP65 results in the unlinking of the Golgi ribbon. Importantly, although the breakdown of the Golgi ribbon caused by depletion of a maintenance factor, such as GRASP65, is irreversible (Fig. 5B), the unlinked Golgi complex organisation that can be seen in tumour cell lines with overactive JNK can be fully reversed by treatment with JNK inhibitors (Fig. 3D,E; supplementary material Fig. S2B).

An additional finding of the present study is that different signalling pathways can phosphorylate GRASP65-Ser277, depending on the physiological context: by ERK1/2 upon growth factor stimulation and wound induction (Yoshimura et al., 2005; Gaietta et al., 2006; Bisel et al., 2008) and by JNK2 during G2. Interestingly, we also find that that both JNK and CDK1 appear to be involved in the phosphorylation of Ser277 GRASP65 during mitosis. However, this interplay between JNK and CDK1 during mitosis requires further investigation. The common theme of this structural reorganisation is the breakup of the Golgi ribbon, which can be transient, as in the case of Golgi reorientation during cell polarisation induced by wound healing (Bisel et al., 2008), or more extensive, as during G2 in preparation for cell entry into mitosis (our data). Thus, the extent of Golgi reorganisation might be a function of the level of phosphorylation of GRASP65-Ser277, and of the combination with additional modifications, such as the phosphorylation in mitosis that involves at least four distinct sites (Preisinger et al., 2005), which would lead to Golgi unstacking, and thus complete Golgi fragmentation.

Thus, an important question is how the activity of these kinases is regulated. The MAP kinase signalling module is composed of three-tiered sequentially acting kinases: a MAPK, a MAPK kinase (MAPKK), and a MAPK kinase kinase (MAPKKK). Specificity of the signalling is ensured by the temporary and local formation of a signalling module of specific composition (directed by a ‘scaffold’). The identification of further elements of the module will help in understanding how JNK2 is directed to induce Golgi disassembly even in the absence of a global rise of JNK activity.

In conclusion, the data presented here have several implications that are related to both the mechanisms of Golgi ribbon formation and the interplay between Golgi membrane structure and/or function and cell cycle regulation, as the definition of the molecular mechanisms that regulate Golgi unlinking during G2 should also help in the identification of additional targets for blocking cell cycle progression in anti-cancer therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture

Normal rat kidney (NRK) and HeLa cells were from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and minimal essential medium, respectively (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), 100 μM minimal essential medium non-essential amino-acid solution, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 U/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin (all Invitrogen). MCF7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 U/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin. All of the cell lines were grown under a controlled atmosphere in the presence of 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Antibodies and reagents

Aphidicolin, thymidine, nocodazole, BFA and SP600125 were from Sigma-Aldrich. DMSO was from Carlo Erba. RO-3306, JNK inhibitors III and VIII, and Mowiol were from Calbiochem. SB203580 was from Tocris Bioscience. U0126 was from Promega. Hoechst 33342 was from Invitrogen. BI2536 was from Axon Medicine BV (Groning, The Netherlands).

The antibodies were from the following sources: anti-phospho-histone H3 (Ser10) from Millipore (Billerica, MA); anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and anti-GM130 from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA); anti-GRASP65 (pS277) from N. Nakamura, Kanazawa University Kakuma, Japan; anti-Flag-M2 from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy); anti-pericentrin and anti-GRASP65 from Abcam; anti-Myc tag, anti-phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2), anti-phosphorylated Jun (pJun), anti-c-Jun, anti-JNK1 and anti-JNK2 from Cell Signaling Technology; and anti-Plk1 from BioLegend. Alexa-Fluor-488-, Alexa-Fluor-633- and Alexa-Fluor-546-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen.

Plasmids, siRNAs and transfection

For construction of N-terminally Flag-tagged GRASP65Δ200, subcloning of R. norvegicus GRASP65 cDNA was carried out, with amplification by PCR with the following oligonucleotides, which contain EcoR1 and EcoR5 sites, followed by insertion into the pcDNA3-3XFLAG plasmid (Sigma): forward, 5′-CGAGAATTCGGATCCCAACGCAGCCC-3′; reverse, 5′-CGCGATATCTCACAACCCAGGCTCTGG-3′. A point mutation of GRASP65-Ser277 into Ala was inserted by digestion with DnpI endonuclease of the PCR amplification with the following primers: forward, 5′-CTCCCTGGGCCTGGGGCTCCTGGCCATGGCACT-3′; reverse, 5′-GAGGGACCCGGACCCCGAGGACCGGTACCGTGA-3′.

The cDNA of rabbit full-length GFP-GRASP65 was from Dr Yanzhuang Wang (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA). The cDNA of human full-length Myc-GRASP65 wt was from Dr Christine Sütterlin (University of California, Irvine, USA). The phospho-depleted mutant Ser277Ala was obtained through mutagenesis with the following primers: forward, 5′-CTTCCTGGGCCTGGGGCTCCCAGCCACAGTGCT-3′; reverse, 5′-GAAGGACCCGGACCCCGAGGGTCGGTGTCACGA-3′. The phospho-mimetic Ser277Asp was obtained through mutagenesis with the following primers: forward, 5′-CTTCCTGGGCCTGGGGATCCCAGCCACAGTGCT-3′; reverse, 5′-GAAGGACCCGGACCCCTAGGGTCGGTGTCACGA-3′. The siRNA-resistant forms of the original construct were obtained with the following primers: forward, 5′-GAATGACACCCTGAAAGCACTGCTGAAAGCAAATGTGGAGAAGCCCGTGA-3′; reverse, 5′-CTTACTGTGGGACTTTCGTGACGACTTTCGTTTACACCTCTTCGGGCACT-3′. The cDNA of GalT-GFP was from Dr Lippincott-Schwartz (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

HeLa cells were transfected with the TansIT-LT1 Transfection Reagent (Mirus), according to the manufacturer instructions.

The siRNA duplexes were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer instructions. GRASP65 was targeted using siRNA duplexes directed against the sequence 5′-CTGAAGGCACTACTGAAAGCCAAT-3′ (Sigma). JNK1, JNK2 and JNK3 were targeted using siRNA duplexes directed against the sequences 5′-GTGGAAAGAATTGATATATAA-3′, 5′-AAGAGAGCTTATCGTGAACTT-3′ and 5′-CCGCATGTGTCTGTATTCATA-3′, respectively. After transfection, the intracellular protein contents were assessed by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by western blotting, and the cells were further processed according to the experimental design.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

HeLa cells were grown on 10 μg/ml fibronectin-coated glass coverslips (Sigma-Aldrich) and treated as described above. They were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 10 min at room temperature. The blocking reagent (0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% saponin, 50 mM NH4Cl) was then added to the cells for 20 min, followed by a 1-h or overnight incubation with the primary antibody in the blocking reagent. The cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with the secondary antibodies (1:400) with 2 μg/ml Hoechst 33342.

Cell-cycle synchronisation, FRAP analysis

For morphological and mitotic index analysis of synchronised cells, HeLa cells were treated as previously described (Colanzi et al., 2007). For the G2 cell synchronisation, the cells were maintained for 20 h in the presence of 9 μM RO3306. The mitotic index analysis of the time-course experiments was performed as described previously (Feinstein and Linstedt, 2007). FRAP experiments were performed as previously described (Colanzi et al., 2007) with the difference that calls treated with JNK inhibitor VIII for 2 h, until the G2/M peak. The half-lives (t½) of the control and inhibitor-VIII-treated cells were assessed, to compare the relative recovery rates between the samples.

Flow cytometry

Trypsinised cells were pelleted, washed in cold PBS, and resuspended in ice-cold ethanol while vortexing. The cells were incubated overnight at 4°C. The next day, the ethanol was removed by centrifugation and the cells were washed in cold PBS and incubated with 50 μg/ml propidium iodide (Invitrogen) for 30 min in the presence of RNase (Sigma). The cells were then analysed using a FacsCanto instrument (BD). The data were plotted with Diva software, with 30,000 events analysed for each sample.

Kinase assay and proteins

A reaction was performed using 1 μg JNK2 kinase incubated with 5 μg substrate in 25 μl kinase buffer (5 mM MOPS, pH 7.2, 5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM EGTA, 400 μM EDTA, 0.05 mM dithiothreitol) at 30°C for 15 min in the presence of 300 μM ATP (Amersham Biosciences). The reactions were terminated by addition of SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and the products were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Ponceau Red to check the loading amounts, and blotted with the antibody against phosphorylated GRASP65-Ser277. GST–JNK2 was purchased from SignalChem. To prepare GST–GRASP65Δ200 and Ser277Ala-GRASP65Δ200, the rat GRASP65Δ200 and the Ser277Ala-GRASP65Δ200 cDNAs were cloned into pGEX-4T2 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences); correct insertion was confirmed by DNA sequencing. The proteins were expressed in BL21 bacteria and purified on glutathione–Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare Life Sciences), following the manufacturer's protocol.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Raman Parashuraman and Alberto Luini for helpful discussion and for providing us with materials. Dr Franck Perez is thanked for the generous gift of the R3G3 antibody. We would also like to thank Chris Berrie for critical reading and editorial revision of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Present address: Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute University, Milan 20132, Italy.

  • ↵‡ Present address: Tissue Engineering, Regeneration and Repair Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    R.I.C., R.B. and A.C. conceived and designed the experiments; R.I.C., R.B., M.L.B., D.S. and I.A. performed the experiments; R.I.C., R.B., M.L.B., D.S., I.A., N.N., D.C. and A.C. analyzed and interpreted the data; R.I.C. and A.C. wrote the paper.

  • Funding

    We acknowledge financial support from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC, Milan, Italy) [grant numbers IG6074 to A.C., IG10341 to D.C.]; R.I.C. and M.L.B. were the recipients of Fellowships from the Italian Foundation for Cancer Research (FIRC, Milan, Italy). Financial support from the Ministry of Economy and Finance, MIUR, projects PON01-00117 and PON02-00029 is also acknowledged.

  • Supplementary material

    Supplementary material available online at http://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/jcs.164871/-/DC1

  • Received October 27, 2014.
  • Accepted April 20, 2015.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Barr, F. A.,
    2. Puype, M.,
    3. Vandekerckhove, J. and
    4. Warren, G.
    (1997). GRASP65, a protein involved in the stacking of Golgi cisternae. Cell 91, 253-262. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80407-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Bisel, B.,
    2. Wang, Y.,
    3. Wei, J.-H.,
    4. Xiang, Y.,
    5. Tang, D.,
    6. Miron-Mendoza, M.,
    7. Yoshimura, S.-i.,
    8. Nakamura, N. and
    9. Seemann, J.
    (2008). ERK regulates Golgi and centrosome orientation towards the leading edge through GRASP65. J. Cell Biol. 182, 837-843. doi:10.1083/jcb.200805045
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bogoyevitch, M. A. and
    2. Kobe, B.
    (2006). Uses for JNK: the many and varied substrates of the c-Jun N-terminal kinases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 1061-1095. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00025-06
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Carcedo, C. H.,
    2. Bonazzi, M.,
    3. Spano, S.,
    4. Turacchio, G.,
    5. Colanzi, A.,
    6. Luini, A. and
    7. Corda, D.
    (2004). Mitotic Golgi partitioning is driven by the membrane-fissioning protein CtBP3/BARS. Science 305, 93-96. doi:10.1126/science.1097775
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Cervigni, R. I.,
    2. Barretta, M. L.,
    3. Persico, A.,
    4. Corda, D. and
    5. Colanzi, A.
    (2011). The role of Aurora-A kinase in the Golgi-dependent control of mitotic entry. Bioarchitecture 1, 61-65. doi:10.4161/bioa.1.2.15329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Colanzi, A. and
    2. Sutterlin, C.
    (2013). Signaling at the Golgi during mitosis. Methods Cell Biol. 118, 383-400. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-417164-0.00023-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Colanzi, A.,
    2. Carcedo, C. H.,
    3. Persico, A.,
    4. Cericola, C.,
    5. Turacchio, G.,
    6. Bonazzi, M.,
    7. Luini, A. and
    8. Corda, D.
    (2007). The Golgi mitotic checkpoint is controlled by BARS-dependent fission of the Golgi ribbon into separate stacks in G2. EMBO J. 26, 2465-2476. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601686
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Cole, N. B.,
    2. Smith, C. L.,
    3. Sciaky, N.,
    4. Terasaki, M.,
    5. Edidin, M. and
    6. Lippincott-Schwartz, J.
    (1996). Diffusional mobility of Golgi proteins in membranes of living cells. Science 273, 797-801. doi:10.1126/science.273.5276.797
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    1. Corda, D.,
    2. Colanzi, A. and
    3. Luini, A.
    (2006). The multiple activities of CtBP/BARS proteins: the Golgi view. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 167-173. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2006.01.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Du, Y.,
    2. Bock, B. C.,
    3. Schachter, K. A.,
    4. Chao, M. and
    5. Gallo, K. A.
    (2005). Cdc42 induces activation loop phosphorylation and membrane targeting of mixed lineage kinase 3. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 42984-42993. doi:10.1074/jbc.M502671200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Duran, J. M.,
    2. Kinseth, M.,
    3. Bossard, C.,
    4. Rose, D. W.,
    5. Polishchuk, R.,
    6. Wu, C. C.,
    7. Yates, J.,
    8. Zimmerman, T. and
    9. Malhotra, V.
    (2008). The role of GRASP55 in Golgi fragmentation and entry of cells into mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 2579-2587. doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-10-0998
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Farhan, H.,
    2. Wendeler, M. W.,
    3. Mitrovic, S.,
    4. Fava, E.,
    5. Silberberg, Y.,
    6. Sharan, R.,
    7. Zerial, M. and
    8. Hauri, H.-P.
    (2010). MAPK signaling to the early secretory pathway revealed by kinase/phosphatase functional screening. J. Cell Biol. 189, 997-1011. doi:10.1083/jcb.200912082
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Feinstein, T. N. and
    2. Linstedt, A. D.
    (2007). Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1-dependent Golgi unlinking occurs in G(2) phase and promotes the G(2)/M cell cycle transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 594-604. doi:10.1091/mbc.E06-06-0530
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Feinstein, T. N. and
    2. Linstedt, A. D.
    (2008). GRASP55 regulates Golgi ribbon formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 2696-2707. doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-11-1200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Gaietta, G. M.,
    2. Giepmans, B. N. G.,
    3. Deerinck, T. J.,
    4. Smith, W. B.,
    5. Ngan, L.,
    6. Llopis, J.,
    7. Adams, S. R.,
    8. Tsien, R. Y. and
    9. Ellisman, M. H.
    (2006). Golgi twins in late mitosis revealed by genetically encoded tags for live cell imaging and correlated electron microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17777-17782. doi:10.1073/pnas.0608509103
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Gao, Y.,
    2. Davies, S. P.,
    3. Augustin, M.,
    4. Woodward, A.,
    5. Patel, U. A.,
    6. Kovelman, R. and
    7. Harvey, K. J.
    (2013). A broad activity screen in support of a chemogenomic map for kinase signalling research and drug discovery. Biochem. J. 451, 313-328. doi:10.1042/BJ20121418
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Gutierrez, G. J.,
    2. Tsuji, T.,
    3. Chen, M.,
    4. Jiang, W. and
    5. Ronai, Z. A.
    (2010a). Interplay between Cdh1 and JNK activity during the cell cycle. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 686-695. doi:10.1038/ncb2071
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gutierrez, G. J.,
    2. Tsuji, T.,
    3. Cross, J. V.,
    4. Davis, R. J.,
    5. Templeton, D. J.,
    6. Jiang, W. and
    7. Ronai, Z. A.
    (2010b). JNK-mediated phosphorylation of Cdc25C regulates cell cycle entry and G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14217-14228. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.121848
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Jarvela, T. and
    2. Linstedt, A. D.
    (2014). Isoform-specific tethering links the Golgi ribbon to maintain compartmentalization. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 133-144. doi:10.1091/mbc.E13-07-0395
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Kellokumpu, S.,
    2. Sormunen, R. and
    3. Kellokumpu, I.
    (2002). Abnormal glycosylation and altered Golgi structure in colorectal cancer: dependence on intra-Golgi pH. FEBS Lett. 516, 217-224. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02535-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Kienzle, C.,
    2. Eisler, S. A.,
    3. Villeneuve, J.,
    4. Brummer, T.,
    5. Olayioye, M. A. and
    6. Hausser, A.
    (2013). PKD controls mitotic Golgi complex fragmentation through a Raf-MEK1 pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 222-233. doi:10.1091/mbc.E12-03-0198
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Lee, K. and
    2. Song, K.
    (2008). Basal c-Jun N-terminal kinases promote mitotic progression through histone H3 phosphorylation. Cell Cycle 7, 216-221. doi:10.4161/cc.7.2.5155
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Lee, I.,
    2. Tiwari, N.,
    3. Dunlop, M. H.,
    4. Graham, M.,
    5. Liu, X. and
    6. Rothman, J. E.
    (2014). Membrane adhesion dictates Golgi stacking and cisternal morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1849-1854. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323895111
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Lin, C.-Y.,
    2. Madsen, M. L.,
    3. Yarm, F. R.,
    4. Jang, Y.-J.,
    5. Liu, X. and
    6. Erikson, R. L.
    (2000). Peripheral Golgi protein GRASP65 is a target of mitotic polo-like kinase (Plk) and Cdc2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12589-12594. doi:10.1073/pnas.220423497
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Lippincott-Schwartz, J. and
    2. Patterson, G. H.
    (2003). Development and use of fluorescent protein markers in living cells. Science 300, 87-91. doi:10.1126/science.1082520
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Lowe, M. and
    2. Barr, F. A.
    (2007). Inheritance and biogenesis of organelles in the secretory pathway. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 429-439. doi:10.1038/nrm2179
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. MacCorkle-Chosnek, R. A.,
    2. VanHooser, A.,
    3. Goodrich, D. W.,
    4. Brinkley, B. R. and
    5. Tan, T.-H.
    (2001). Cell cycle regulation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase activity at the centrosomes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 289, 173-180. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.5948
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Millarte, V. and
    2. Farhan, H.
    (2012). The Golgi in cell migration: regulation by signal transduction and its implications for cancer cell metastasis. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, 498278. doi:10.1100/2012/498278
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Mingo-Sion, A. M.,
    2. Marietta, P. M.,
    3. Koller, E.,
    4. Wolf, D. M. and
    5. Van Den Berg, C. L.
    (2004). Inhibition of JNK reduces G2/M transit independent of p53, leading to endoreduplication, decreased proliferation, and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 23, 596-604. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207147
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Oktay, K.,
    2. Buyuk, E.,
    3. Oktem, O.,
    4. Oktay, M. and
    5. Giancotti, F. G.
    (2008). The c-Jun N-terminal kinase JNK functions upstream of Aurora B to promote entry into mitosis. Cell Cycle 7, 533-541. doi:10.4161/cc.7.4.5660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Persico, A.,
    2. Cervigni, R. I.,
    3. Barretta, M. L.,
    4. Corda, D. and
    5. Colanzi, A.
    (2010). Golgi partitioning controls mitotic entry through Aurora-A kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 3708-3721. doi:10.1091/mbc.E10-03-0243
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Preisinger, C.,
    2. Korner, R.,
    3. Wind, M.,
    4. Lehmann, W. D.,
    5. Kopajtich, R. and
    6. Barr, F. A.
    (2005). Plk1 docking to GRASP65 phosphorylated by Cdk1 suggests a mechanism for Golgi checkpoint signalling. EMBO J. 24, 753-765. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600569
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Puthenveedu, M. A. and
    2. Linstedt, A. D.
    (2004). Gene replacement reveals that p115/SNARE interactions are essential for Golgi biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1253-1256. doi:10.1073/pnas.0306373101
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Puthenveedu, M. A.,
    2. Bachert, C.,
    3. Puri, S.,
    4. Lanni, F. and
    5. Linstedt, A. D.
    (2006). GM130 and GRASP65-dependent lateral cisternal fusion allows uniform Golgi-enzyme distribution. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 238-248. doi:10.1038/ncb1366
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Sengupta, D. and
    2. Linstedt, A. D.
    (2010). Mitotic inhibition of GRASP65 organelle tethering involves Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) phosphorylation proximate to an internal PDZ ligand. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 39994-40003. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.189449
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sengupta, D.,
    2. Truschel, S.,
    3. Bachert, C. and
    4. Linstedt, A. D.
    (2009). Organelle tethering by a homotypic PDZ interaction underlies formation of the Golgi membrane network. J. Cell Biol. 186, 41-55. doi:10.1083/jcb.200902110
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Shorter, J. and
    2. Warren, G.
    (2002). Golgi architecture and inheritance. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 379-420. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.030602.133733
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Sutterlin, C.,
    2. Hsu, P.,
    3. Mallabiabarrena, A. and
    4. Malhotra, V.
    (2002). Fragmentation and dispersal of the pericentriolar Golgi complex is required for entry into mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell 109, 359-369. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00720-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Sutterlin, C.,
    2. Polishchuk, R.,
    3. Pecot, M. and
    4. Malhotra, V.
    (2005). The Golgi-associated protein GRASP65 regulates spindle dynamics and is essential for cell division. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 3211-3222. doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-12-1065
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Tang, D.,
    2. Yuan, H.,
    3. Vielemeyer, O.,
    4. Perez, F. and
    5. Wang, Y.
    (2012). Sequential phosphorylation of GRASP65 during mitotic Golgi disassembly. Biol. Open 1, 1204-1214. doi:10.1242/bio.20122659
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Truschel, S. T.,
    2. Zhang, M.,
    3. Bachert, C.,
    4. Macbeth, M. R. and
    5. Linstedt, A. D.
    (2012). Allosteric regulation of GRASP protein-dependent Golgi membrane tethering by mitotic phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 19870-19875. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.326256
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Vassilev, L. T.
    (2006). Cell cycle synchronization at the G2/M phase border by reversible inhibition of CDK1. Cell Cycle 5, 2555-2556. doi:10.4161/cc.5.22.3463
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Veenendaal, T.,
    2. Jarvela, T.,
    3. Grieve, A. G.,
    4. van Es, J. H.,
    5. Linstedt, A. D. and
    6. Rabouille, C.
    (2014). GRASP65 controls the cis Golgi integrity in vivo. Biol. Open 3, 431-443. doi:10.1242/bio.20147757
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Villeneuve, J.,
    2. Scarpa, M.,
    3. Ortega-Bellido, M. and
    4. Malhotra, V.
    (2013). MEK1 inactivates Myt1 to regulate Golgi membrane fragmentation and mitotic entry in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 32, 72-85. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Vinke, F. P.,
    2. Grieve, A. G. and
    3. Rabouille, C.
    (2011). The multiple facets of the Golgi reassembly stacking proteins. Biochem. J. 433, 423-433. doi:10.1042/BJ20101540
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Waetzig, V. and
    2. Herdegen, T.
    (2005). Context-specific inhibition of JNKs: overcoming the dilemma of protection and damage. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 26, 455-461. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2005.07.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Wang, Y.,
    2. Seemann, J.,
    3. Pypaert, M.,
    4. Shorter, J. and
    5. Warren, G.
    (2003). A direct role for GRASP65 as a mitotically regulated Golgi stacking factor. EMBO J. 22, 3279-3290. doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg317
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Wang, Y.,
    2. Satoh, A. and
    3. Warren, G.
    (2005). Mapping the functional domains of the Golgi stacking factor GRASP65. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 4921-4928. doi:10.1074/jbc.M412407200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Wei, J.-H. and
    2. Seemann, J.
    (2009). Mitotic division of the mammalian Golgi apparatus. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 810-816. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.03.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Yoshimura, S.-i.,
    2. Yoshioka, K.,
    3. Barr, F. A.,
    4. Lowe, M.,
    5. Nakayama, K.,
    6. Ohkuma, S. and
    7. Nakamura, N.
    (2005). Convergence of cell cycle regulation and growth factor signals on GRASP65. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 23048-23056. doi:10.1074/jbc.M502442200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

Keywords

 Download PDF

Email
Research Article
JNK2 controls fragmentation of the Golgi complex and the G2/M transition through phosphorylation of GRASP65
Romina Ines Cervigni, Raffaella Bonavita, Maria Luisa Barretta, Daniela Spano, Inmaculada Ayala, Nobuhiro Nakamura, Daniela Corda, Antonino Colanzi
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 2249-2260; doi: 10.1242/jcs.164871
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.

Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.