Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Ciliary adenylyl cyclases control the Hedgehog pathway
Laura Vuolo, Antonio Herrera, Blanca Torroba, Anghara Menendez, Sebastian Pons
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 2928-2937; doi: 10.1242/jcs.172635
Laura Vuolo
Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, Barcelona 08028, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Herrera
Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, Barcelona 08028, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Blanca Torroba
Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, Barcelona 08028, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anghara Menendez
Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, Barcelona 08028, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Pons
Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona (CSIC), Parc Científic de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, Barcelona 08028, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: spfbmc@ibmb.csic.es
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Adenylyl cyclase isoforms expressed by CGNPs inhibit the Hh pathway. (A,B) Expression of the different membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases in CGNPs purified from the P7 mouse cerebellum as evaluated by q-PCR. (C) Expression of the same adenylyl cyclases (except AC4) studied by in situ hybridization. The red arrowheads indicate the position of the Purkinje cell layer and the relative position of each cell layer in the P7 cerebellum is shown (oEGL, iEGL, outer and inner external germinative layer; PCL, Purkinje cell layer; IGL, internal granular layer). (D,E) Proliferation of CGNPs studied by [3H]thymidine or BrdU incorporation (a pulse for the last 4 h in culture) in cultures transfected with AC1, AC3, AC5 or AC6 and grown for 24 h in the presence of 3 µg/ml of Shh. A diagram of the expression vector is shown above the graphs. (F,G) Experiment similar to that described in D,E but in this case CGNP proliferation was induced by transfecting a constitute-active form of Smo (SmoM2). For BrdU incorporation, the bars represent the percentage of the transfected population (GFP) that incorporated BrdU. (H) Gli1 in western blots of CGNP cultures transfected for 24 h with different adenylyl cyclase isoforms. (I) Effect of the expression of AC5 on CGNPs in culture where proliferation was induced by the expression of SmoM2, dominant-negative (dn)PKA or the addition of Shh (3 µg/ml). (J–M) GBS-dependent luciferase activity was studied in CGNP cultures transfected for 24 h with Gli1, Gli2, Gli3 or combined Gli1 and Gli3 and the different adenylyl cyclase isoforms. A constitutively active form of PKA (PKACαQR) was used as a positive control. A diagram of the expression vectors is shown above the graphs. All the bar graphs in this figure show the mean±s.d. of at least three independent experiments. The total number of cells counted for each data point in panels E, G and I is indicated inside each bar. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test). Scale bar: 50 µm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Adenylyl cyclases require ciliary localization to regulate the Hh pathway. (A) CGNP cultures were transfected for 24 h with HA-tagged constructs of AC1, AC3, AC5 or AC6 cloned in pCIG, a nuclear-GFP-expressing bicistronic vector. The cells were stained with anti-acetylated-tubulin (AcTubulin, cilium marker, red), anti-HA (green) and anti-GFP (transfection, blue) antibodies. AC3, AC5 and AC6 but not AC1 accumulated in the cilium. (B) Endogenous expression of AC5 and/or AC6 (green) was detected in the cilium of CGNPs and NIH3T3 cells with an antibody that detects both molecules with similar affinity (see supplementary material Fig. S1B). Acetylated Tubulin (red) and DAPI (blue) were used as markers of the cilium and nucleus, respectively. (C) The chart shows inter-species sequence conservation and intramolecular location of a putative AC5 ciliary location motif. The motif was predicted through multiple alignment of AC5 with other similar ciliary proteins. (D) Mutation of amino acids 76–77 of AC5 to AA (AC5WR76-77AA–HA) impaired its ciliary location in NIH-3T3 cells. Cultures were stained with anti-AcTubulin (red), anti-HA (green) anti-GFP (purple) antibodies and DAPI (blue). The boxed areas are shown magnified with only the HA staining on the right. (E,F) Shh-induced proliferation of CGNPs was not inhibited by transfection with the AC5WR76-77AA mutant as assessed by [3H]thymidine or BrdU incorporation. All the bar graphs in this figure show the mean±s.d. of at least three independent experiments. The total number of cells counted for each data point in panels F is indicated inside each bar. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test). Scale bars: 10 µm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Expression of AC5 and AC6 represses the Hh pathway in the developing chicken neural tube. (A–D) HH-12 chicken neural tubes were electroporated with different constructs cloned in pCIG (a diagram of the vector is shown above B) and they were left to develop for 16 h. (A) Scheme of the working protocol and expression levels of AC1, AC3, AC5 and AC6 in the neural tubes studied by q-PCR. (B) BrdU (∼1 µl at 0.5 µg/µl) was injected into the neural tube lumen 4 h prior to fixation and transverse sections of the neural tube were then stained with antibodies against BrdU (proliferation, red) and GFP (transfection, green), and DAPI (nucleus, blue). (C,D) The percentage of BrdU-positive cells among the transfected population was calculated separately for the dorsal and ventral neural tube. PKACαQR was used as a positive control. (E) In an experiment similar to that for A–D, the cell cycle phase distribution was studied in the population of transfected cells (GFP-positive) by FACS analysis, and the Gli3R and Bcl2 combination was used as a positive control. (F,G) The expression of Olig2 (a marker of motoneuron precursors, red) was studied in HH-12 chicken neural tubes expressing AC3, AC5 or AC6 at 16 hpe (green). The number of Olig2-positive cells in the electroporated side (EP) was compared in each case to the non-electroporated side (NEP). (H,I) HH-12 chicken neural tubes were transfected for 16 h with AC3, AC5 or AC6 cloned in pCIG (green) together with pGBSRED, a RFP-expressing reporter of Hh pathway activity (red). Diagrams of the vectors are shown above the panels. The percentage of RFP-positive cells among the transfected population is shown in the bar graph. All the bar graphs in this figure show the mean±s.d. of at least three independent experiments. The total number of cells counted in each data point in panels C, D, F and I is indicated inside each bar. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test). Scale bars: 50 µm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Adenylyl cyclase knockdown activates the Hh pathway. (A) Mouse CGNP cultures grown in the presence or absence of low doses of Shh (0.3 µg/ml), were transfected for 24 h with pSHIN expressing different short hairpin molecules directed against mouse AC3, AC5 or AC6. [3H]thymidine incorporation in the last 4 h of cultures was used to study cell proliferation. (B) HH-12 chicken neural tubes were transfected for 16 h with pSHIN expressing selected short hairpin molecules directed against AC3, AC5 or AC6, or a combination of these, together with the pGBSLUC luciferase reporter of Hh pathway activity. The efficiency of the different shRNAs is shown in supplementary material Fig. S1F,G. (C,D) As in B but using pGBSRED as the reporter. The dominant-negative (dn)PKA construct was used as a positive control of Hh pathway activation. The percentage of transfected cells that are RFP-positive is shown in the bar graph. Diagrams of the expression vector are shown above the panels. All the bar graphs in this figure show the mean±s.d. of at least three independent experiments. The total number of cells counted in each data point in panel D is indicated inside each bar. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test). Scale bar: 50 µm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    The Hh pathway is repressed by Gαs and activated by Gαi in the developing neural tube. (A–D) HH-12 chicken neural tubes were electroporated with different constructs cloned in pCIG for 24 h. Transverse sections were stained with antibodies against Pax7 (red in A,C), Olig2 (red in B,D; and blue in A,C) and Nkx 2.2 (blue in B,D). GFP expression (green) denotes the transfection intensity and it is shown to the right of each image. (E) Bar graph showing the percentage of positive cells for each maker with respect to the non-electroporated side (left). (F) In an experiment similar to that in E, the activity of the Hh pathway was assessed with the GBS-Luc reporter. Diagrams of the expression vector are shown above the graphs. The bar graphs show the level of Luciferase activity with respect to the control (pCIG) transfected neural tubes. All the bar graphs in this figure show the mean±s.d. of at least three independent experiments. The total number of cells counted in each data point in panel E is indicated inside each bar. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test). Scale bar: 50 µm.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Adenylyl cyclase
  • Cerebellar granular neuron precursor
  • Hedgehog pathway
  • Primary cilium

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ciliary adenylyl cyclases control the Hedgehog pathway
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Ciliary adenylyl cyclases control the Hedgehog pathway
Laura Vuolo, Antonio Herrera, Blanca Torroba, Anghara Menendez, Sebastian Pons
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 2928-2937; doi: 10.1242/jcs.172635
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Ciliary adenylyl cyclases control the Hedgehog pathway
Laura Vuolo, Antonio Herrera, Blanca Torroba, Anghara Menendez, Sebastian Pons
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 2928-2937; doi: 10.1242/jcs.172635

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • An SNX10-dependent mechanism down-regulates fusion between mature osteoclasts
  • Combined heterogeneity in cell size and deformability promotes cancer invasiveness
  • Non-canonical ago loading of EV-derived exogenous single stranded miRNA in recipient cells
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Follow us on Instagram

Cell science is bursting with beautiful images and over on Instagram, we’re showing them off! Find both JCS and FocalPlane on Instagram for stories and techniques across cell biology.


An interview with Derek Walsh

Professor Derek Walsh is the guest editor of our new special issue Cell Biology of Host-Pathogen Interactions. In an interview, Derek tells us about his work in the field of DNA viruses, the impact of the pandemic on virology and what his role as Guest Editor taught him.


How to improve your scientific writing

"If you are a scientist and you want to succeed, you must become a writer."

How do scientists become master storytellers? We called on our journal Editors, proofreaders and contributors to our community sites for their advice on how to improve your scientific writing.


Meet the preLighters: Jennifer Ann Black

Following the theme of our latest special issue, postdoc Jennifer Ann Black studies replication stress and genome plasticity in Leishmania in Professor Luiz Tosi’s lab in Sao Paolo. We caught up with Jenn (virtually) to hear about her relocation to Brazil mid-pandemic, her research on parasites and what she enjoys about ‘preLighting’.

In our special issue, Chandrakar et al. and Rosazza et al. present their latest work on Leishmania.


Mole – The Corona Files

“There are millions of people around the world who continue to believe that the Terrible Pandemic is a hoax.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992