Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
Sqstm1–GFP knock-in mice reveal dynamic actions of Sqstm1 during autophagy and under stress conditions in living cells
Atsushi Eino, Shun Kageyama, Takefumi Uemura, Hiromichi Annoh, Tetsuya Saito, Ichiei Narita, Satoshi Waguri, Masaaki Komatsu
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 4453-4461; doi: 10.1242/jcs.180174
Atsushi Eino
1Department of Biochemistry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
2Division of Clinical Nephrology and Rheumatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shun Kageyama
1Department of Biochemistry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takefumi Uemura
3Department of Anatomy and Histology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiromichi Annoh
3Department of Anatomy and Histology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tetsuya Saito
1Department of Biochemistry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ichiei Narita
2Division of Clinical Nephrology and Rheumatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satoshi Waguri
3Department of Anatomy and Histology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: komatsu-ms@med.niigata-u.ac.jp waguri@fmu.ac.jp
Masaaki Komatsu
1Department of Biochemistry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: komatsu-ms@med.niigata-u.ac.jp waguri@fmu.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Generation of Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ mice. (A) Schematic representation of the targeting vector and the targeted allele of the Sqstm1 gene. The coding exons, numbered such that the initiation codon appears in exon 1, are depicted by black boxes. E2-cDNA-GFP-pA indicates the Sqstm1 cDNA fragment (302–1326) fused with GFP cDNA and the SV40 poly(A) sequence. The probe used for Southern blot analysis is depicted as a gray ellipse. BamHI, BamHI sites; neo, neomycin-resistance gene cassette; DT-A, diphtheria toxin gene. (B) Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA extracted from mice tail snips. Wild-type and knock-in alleles were detected as 11- and 5-kb bands, respectively. (C) Immunoblot of Sqstm1 in MEFs. Lysates of MEFs of the indicated genotypes were immunoblotted with anti-Sqstm1, anti-GFP and anti-actin antibodies. LC3-I and LC3-II indicate a cytoplasmic form and an autophagosome-localized form of LC3B, respectively. The LC3-II on the inner membrane of autophagosomes is degraded after fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. (D) Interaction of Sqstm1–GFP with endogenous proteins. Lysates prepared from wild-type, Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ and Sqstm1-GFPKI/KI MEFs were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-GFP antibody, followed by immunoblotting with the specified antibodies. The data shown are representative of three separate experiments.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Dissection of Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs under starvation conditions. (A) Immunoblot analysis. Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were cultured in regular or starvation medium for 2 h (stv.) or regular medium with E64d and pepstatin A for 24 h (EP). Cell lysates were prepared, followed by immunoblot analysis with the specified antibodies. The data shown are representative of three separate experiments. (B) Immunofluorescence staining. Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were cultured in regular (non-deprived) or starvation medium for 2 h (deprived), and then immunostained with anti-LC3 and anti-GFP antibodies. Each inset is a magnified image. Scale bar: 10 µm. (C) Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were cultured in starvation medium for 1 h and directly observed by time-lapse video microscopy. Scale bar: 1 μm. The duration of each spot of Sqstm1–GFP was measured for 26 cases, which is represented graphically underneath the images. (D) Structured Illumination Microscopic (SIM) analysis. Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs under starvation conditions were immunostained with anti-LC3 antibody, and then observed by SIM. Scale bar: 1 µm. (E) Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were cultured in amino-acid-free medium for 1 h, and then fixed for immunoelectron microscopy using anti-GFP antibody as described in the Materials and Methods. Four representative profiles of autophagosomes are shown. Colloidal gold particles indicating Sqstm1–GFP (arrowheads) and high-density structures positive for Sqstm1–GFP (arrows) are labeled. Scale bars: 200 nm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Dissection of Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs under stress conditions. (A) Relative mRNA levels of Sqstm1, GFP, and Nqo1 and Ho-1. Total RNAs were prepared from Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs cultured for 12 h in the presence or absence of 10 µM sodium arsenite (As[III]) and then reverse-transcribed into cDNAs, which were used as templates for real-time quantitative PCR analysis. Values were normalized to the amount of each mRNA in the non-treated MEFs. The experiments were performed three times; data are mean±s.e.m. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 (Welch test). (B) Immunoblot analysis. Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were cultured as described in A. Total cell lysates and nuclear fractions were prepared and subjected to immunoblot analysis with the specified antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (C) Immunoprecipitation (IP) analysis. Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were cultured as described in A. Immunoprecipitates obtained with anti-GFP antibody were analyzed by immunoblotting with the specified antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (D) Immunoblot analysis. Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ and Atg7−/−;Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were challenged by As[III]. After removal of As[III], cells were cultured in regular medium for the indicated time. Cell lysates were prepared and subjected to immunoblot analysis with the specified antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (E) Immunofluorescence staining. Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were cultured as described in D, and then immunostained with anti-LC3 antibody. Each inset is a magnified image. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Time-lapse video microscopic analysis with Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs cultured as shown in D. Scale bar: 1 μm. (G) Immunoelectron microscopy. Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ MEFs were cultured as described in D, and fixed 1 h (d) or 3 h (a,b, and c) after removal of As[III]. They were then immunolabeled with anti-GFP antibody, followed by secondary antibody conjugated to colloidal gold particles (indicated by arrowheads for c and d). The boxed region in a was magnified and is shown in the inset. For better recognition of colloidal gold particles on dark background area, gamma correction was performed for c and d. Scale bars: 100 nm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    In vivo analyses of Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ mice under autophagy-impaired conditions. (A) Immunoblotting of livers of mice of the indicated genotypes. Liver homogenates prepared from 4–5-week-old mice of the indicated genotypes were subjected to NuPAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. (B) Immunohistofluorescence analysis of Sqstm1–GFP, Sqstm1, Ser351-phosphorylated Sqstm1 and Keap1. Liver sections from 4–5-week-old mice of the indicated genotypes were triple-immunostained for GFP, Sqstm1, and Ser351-phosphorylated Sqstm1 (upper panels) or GFP, Sqstm1 and Keap1 antibodies (bottom panels). The rightmost column shows the merged images of GFP (green), Sqstm1 (red), and S351-phosphorylated Sqstm1 (blue) in the upper panel, and GFP (green), Sqstm1 (red), and Keap1 (blue) in the bottom panel. Scale bars: 50 µm. (C) Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of Nqo1, Gstm1, and Ho-1 in mouse livers. Total RNAs were prepared from livers of 4–5-week-old mice of the indicated genotypes. Values were normalized to the amount of mRNA in the Atg7f/f liver. Experiments were performed three times. Data are means±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (Welch test). (D) Histological analysis of livers from 4–5-week-old mice of the indicated genotypes. Livers were processed for H&E staining. C, central vein, P, portal vein. Scale bars: 50 µm. (E) Liver weight normalized to body weight. Data are mean±s.e.m. of Atg7f/f (n=4), Atg7f/f;Albumin-Cre (n=6), Atg7f/f;Sqstm1-GFPKI/+(n=4) and Atg7f/f;Albumin-Cre;Sqstm1-GFPKI/+ (n=5) mice from each group. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (Welch test). (F) Liver function tests of the mice used in E. Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were measured. Data are mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (Welch test).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Sqstm1
  • Autophagy
  • Selective Autophagy
  • NRF2
  • Knock-in mice

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sqstm1–GFP knock-in mice reveal dynamic actions of Sqstm1 during autophagy and under stress conditions in living cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
Sqstm1–GFP knock-in mice reveal dynamic actions of Sqstm1 during autophagy and under stress conditions in living cells
Atsushi Eino, Shun Kageyama, Takefumi Uemura, Hiromichi Annoh, Tetsuya Saito, Ichiei Narita, Satoshi Waguri, Masaaki Komatsu
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 4453-4461; doi: 10.1242/jcs.180174
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
Sqstm1–GFP knock-in mice reveal dynamic actions of Sqstm1 during autophagy and under stress conditions in living cells
Atsushi Eino, Shun Kageyama, Takefumi Uemura, Hiromichi Annoh, Tetsuya Saito, Ichiei Narita, Satoshi Waguri, Masaaki Komatsu
Journal of Cell Science 2015 128: 4453-4461; doi: 10.1242/jcs.180174

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Chromatin organization at the nuclear periphery as revealed by image analysis of structured illumination microscopy data
  • Microtubule organization within mitotic spindles revealed by serial block face scanning electron microscopy and image analysis
  • Localization of phosphorylated connexin 43 using serial section immunogold electron microscopy
Show more TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Autophagy

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Cell scientist to watch: Janet Iwasa

Read our interview with molecular animator Janet Iwasa, where she talks about her transition from the wet lab, explains how animation can facilitate research and discusses the challenges of the field.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Mole – The Corona files

“Despite everything, it's just incredible that we get to do science.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992