Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
REV-ERBα influences the stability and nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor
Takashi Okabe, Rohit Chavan, Sara S. Fonseca Costa, Andrea Brenna, Jürgen A. Ripperger, Urs Albrecht
Journal of Cell Science 2016 129: 4143-4154; doi: 10.1242/jcs.190959
Takashi Okabe
Dept. of Biology, Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rohit Chavan
Dept. of Biology, Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara S. Fonseca Costa
Dept. of Biology, Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Brenna
Dept. of Biology, Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen A. Ripperger
Dept. of Biology, Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Urs Albrecht
Dept. of Biology, Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Urs Albrecht
  • For correspondence: urs.albrecht@unifr.ch
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    GR protein, but not mRNA, is highly expressed in Rev-Erbα−/− mice. (A) Western blots of liver extracts from wild-type (WT) and Rev-erbα−/− mice showing expression of GR and tubulin using their respective antibodies. Liver whole-cell lysates were extracted from wild-type and Rev-erbα−/− mice every 6 h, beginning at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 0 for one 24-h cycle. (B) Quantification of the GR signal normalized to tubulin (mean±s.d., n=3). **P<0.01 (two-way ANOVA). (C) Quantification of glucocorticoid receptor (Nr3c1) mRNA in the liver. Liver total RNA was extracted from wild-type and Rev-erbα−/− mice every 6 h, beginning at ZT0 for one 24-h cycle, and Nr3c1 transcripts were quantified (mean±s.d., n=3). (D) Quantification of Rev-erbα (Nr1d1) mRNA in the liver. Liver total RNA was extracted from wild-type and Rev-erbα−/− mice every 6 h, beginning at ZT0 for one 24-h cycle, and Rev-erbα transcripts were quantified (mean±s.d., n=3). (E) Schematic representation of murine Nr3c1 promoter with its two REV-ERBα response elements (ROREs). (F) Luciferase assay of Nr3c1::luc reporter constructs with Rev-erbα overexpression plasmids in NIH3T3 cells. Bmal1::luc was used as a positive control (mean±s.d., n=3). ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    REV-ERBα and GR compete with each other for binding to HSP90, resulting in the destabilization of GR protein. (A) Western blot of whole-cell extracts from NIH3T3 cells transfected with increasing amounts of expression vector for Rev-erbα with indicated antibodies. The lower panel shows the quantification of GR signal (mean±s.d., n=3). **P<0.01 (t-test). (B) Western blot (WB) of HSP90 immunoprecipitates (IP: HSP90) and whole-cell extracts (Input) from NIH3T3 cells transfected with the expression vector for Rev-erbα. The lower panel shows the quantification of the GR and REV-ERBα signal in HSP90 immunoprecipitates normalized to that of HSP90 (mean±s.d., n=3). *P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test). (C) Western blot of HSP90 immunoprecipitates (IP: HSP90) and whole-cell extracts (Input) from liver of wild-type (WT) and Rev-erbα−/− mice (Rev−/−). The lower panel shows the quantification of the GR and REV-ERBα signal in HSP90 immunoprecipitates normalized to that of HSP90 (mean±s.d., n=3). **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (t-test). (D) Western blot of whole-cell extracts from NIH3T3 cells transfected with expression vector for Rev-erbα and treated with cycloheximide (CHX; 100 μg/ml). The middle panel shows the quantification of GR signal. GR half-life with CHX alone is 10 h (R2=0.84, n=4) and with CHX and Rev-erbα it is 5.2 h (R2=0.98, n=4). The lower panel shows the quantification of HSP90 signal. HSP90 half-life with CHX alone is 8.7 h (R2=0.87, n=4) and with CHX and Rev-erbα it is 5.6 h (R2=0.99, n=4). Results are mean±s.d. The P-values given on the figure were calculated with a two-way ANOVA test.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Cellular distribution of REV-ERBα at different times of day. Immunohistochemistry in the liver of wild-type and Rev-Erbα−/− mice at ZT8 and ZT20. Staining with antibodies recognizing HSP90 (a marker for cytoplasm) and REV-ERBα are in green and red, respectively. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). The pink color indicates nuclear REV-ERBα and the yellow color cytoplasmic REV-ERBα. Note the reversed cellular distribution of REV-ERBα compared to GR (Fig. 4) in wild type. Scale bar: 50 µm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    The change in cellular distribution of GR that is dependent on the time of day is abolished in Rev-erbα−/− mice. Immunohistochemistry in the liver of wild-type and Rev-Erbα−/− mice at ZT8 and ZT20. Staining with antibodies recognizing HSP90 (marker for cytoplasm) and GR are in green and red, respectively. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). The pink color indicates nuclear GR and the yellow color cytoplasmic GR. Scale bar: 50 µm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    REV-ERBα and GR reciprocally influence their nuclear localization. (A) Western blot of the cytoplasm and nuclear fraction of the liver of wild-type (WT) and Rev-Erbα−/− (Rev−/−) mice at ZT8 and ZT20. The lower panel shows the quantification of signals (mean±s.d., n=4). *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test). (B) The levels of corticosterone in the plasma of wild-type (black bars) and Rev-Erbα−/− (white bars) mice revealed by ELISA (n=6, mean±s.d.).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Diurnal interaction of GR and REV-ERBα with HSP90 in liver and sites of interaction on HSP90. (A) Western blot of HSP90 immunoprecipitates (IP: HSP90) (right panel) and whole-cell extracts (Input) from liver cells of wild-type mice. Livers were collected at ZT0, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. (B) Pulldown assays with an N-terminal (N, blue), middle (M, red) and C-terminal (C, green) HSP90 fragment fused to GST that had been expressed in bacteria by IPTG induction and purified with gluthatione sepharose resin. The complex-resin–GST proteins were coimmunoprecipitated with either LBD-GR or REV-ERBα, both fused to a His tag, that had been also expressed in bacteria, purified using nickel resin and eluted using imidazole. The pulldown was detected by western blotting. Anti-GST antibodies reveal a 55-kDa GST-N protein, a 70-kDa GST-M protein and a 40-kDa GST-C protein. An anti-His tag antibody reveals a 25-kDa GR-LBD and 75-kDa REV-ERBα protein in the GST-N, GST-M and GST-C fractions, respectively.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    REV-ERBα and GR affect target genes of each other in primary cultured hepatocytes. Western blots of primary cultured hepatocytes of wild-type (WT) and Rev-Erbα−/− (Rev−/−) mice. Cells were incubated with dexamethasone (1 µM) for 24 h, and culture medium was changed for one with or without 100 mM ethanol. (A) IκBα (IκB) and p-IκBα (p-IκB) specific antibodies reveal an increase in expression of IκBα in Rev-Erbα−/− cells and an increase of p-IκBα in wild type after ethanol treatment (mean±s.d., n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test). (B) GR- and NF-κB-specific antibodies reveal increased expression of GR in Rev-Erbα−/− hepatocytes, increased nuclear NF-κB signal in wild type cells and a decreased signal of NF-κB in Rev-Erbα−/− cells after ethanol treatment (mean±s.d., n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test). (C) ELISA of TNF in primary cultured hepatocytes from wild-type and Rev-Erbα−/− mice. Cells were treated with GR or IκBα shRNA lentiviral particles. Scrambled shRNA lentiviral particles (sc) were used as a negative control. At 24 h after transduction, dexamethasone (1 µM) was added and cells were incubated for 24 h, and then the culture medium was changed for one with or without 100 mM ethanol (mean±s.d., n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test). (D) Western blot of primary cultured hepatocytes of wild-type mice. Cells were treated with GR shRNA lentiviral particles. Scrambled shRNA lentiviral particles were used as a negative control. The right panel shows the quantification of signals (mean±s.d., n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (t-test).

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Gene expression changes in Rev-erbα−/− liver and comparison with GR target genes. (A) Venn-diagram based on the RNA sequencing analysis of Rev-erbα−/− and control (wild-type, WT) livers at ZT8 (red) and ZT20 (blue). (B) Comparison of the 846 genes altered at ZT8 (red) in Rev-Erbα−/− liver with datasets from Phuc Le et al. (2005) (yellow and green, ZT4–ZT8). The yellow circle represents gene expression alterations in the liver after dexamethasone treatment assessed by microarray. The green circle represents genes detected by a ChIP-on-chip assay using an antiserum raised against GR to reveal chromatin bound by GR. (C) Verification of three of the eight genes in common to all three evaluations: alcohol dehydrogenase 1 (Adh1), glycine N-methyltransferase (Gnmt), and hepatic lipase C (Lipc). Values are mean±s.e.m., n=3. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-test). (D) Verification of the bona fide REV-ERBα target gene Insig2a and the GR target gene IκBα (Nfkbia) (values are mean±s.e.m., n=3. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-test). (E) Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealing the time-dependent interaction of GR with the promoters of Per1, Insig2, Adh1, Gnmt and Lipc. Values are mean±s.e.m., n=8, *P<0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni-post test).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Nuclear receptor
  • Circadian clock
  • Glucocorticoid receptor
  • REV-ERBα
  • Hsp90

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
REV-ERBα influences the stability and nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
REV-ERBα influences the stability and nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor
Takashi Okabe, Rohit Chavan, Sara S. Fonseca Costa, Andrea Brenna, Jürgen A. Ripperger, Urs Albrecht
Journal of Cell Science 2016 129: 4143-4154; doi: 10.1242/jcs.190959
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
REV-ERBα influences the stability and nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor
Takashi Okabe, Rohit Chavan, Sara S. Fonseca Costa, Andrea Brenna, Jürgen A. Ripperger, Urs Albrecht
Journal of Cell Science 2016 129: 4143-4154; doi: 10.1242/jcs.190959

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Human-specific staphylococcal virulence factors enhance pathogenicity in a humanised zebrafish C5a receptor model
  • Jagged–Notch-mediated divergence of immune cell crosstalk maintains the anti-inflammatory response in visceral leishmaniasis
  • PDZD8 mediated lipid transfer at ER-LE/lys contacts is required for LE/lys positioning and neurite outgrowth
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Cell scientist to watch: Janet Iwasa

Read our interview with molecular animator Janet Iwasa, where she talks about her transition from the wet lab, explains how animation can facilitate research and discusses the challenges of the field.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Mole – The Corona files

“Despite everything, it's just incredible that we get to do science.”

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992