Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact the journal
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Interviews
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contact
    • Contact the journal
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
The Rap1–cofilin-1 pathway coordinates actin reorganization and MTOC polarization at the B cell immune synapse
Jia C. Wang, Jeff Y.-J. Lee, Sonja Christian, May Dang-Lawson, Caitlin Pritchard, Spencer A. Freeman, Michael R. Gold
Journal of Cell Science 2017 130: 1094-1109; doi: 10.1242/jcs.191858
Jia C. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff Y.-J. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonja Christian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
May Dang-Lawson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caitlin Pritchard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spencer A. Freeman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Gold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael R. Gold
  • For correspondence: mgold@mail.ubc.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Rap1 activation is important for MTOC polarization. (A,B) Primary B cells were mixed with 4.5-µm anti-IgM-coated beads for the indicated times and then stained for α-tubulin, F-actin and nuclei (DAPI). Representative z-projections (A). In B, MTOC polarity indices (PI) (line graph) were calculated as in Fig. S1D for 14–34 bead–cell conjugates per point. Results are mean±s.e.m. for three experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared to the <1 min time point. The percentage of cells with a PI≤0.75 was determined in each experiment and the mean±s.e.m. is shown at each time point (∼20% would be random MTOC distribution; see Fig. S1E and Table S1). (C–F) LPS-stimulated primary B cells were transduced with control siRNA or Rap1a and Rap1b siRNAs. Blots show Rap1 knockdown (C). The cells were mixed with 3-µm beads coated with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated anti-IgM and then stained for α-tubulin. For cells mixed with beads for 30 min, representative 3D reconstruction images are shown (D) along with PIs for >100 conjugates from four experiments (E). ****P<0.0001. F shows the full timecourse (mean±s.e.m.; four experiments with >16 cells per time point per experiment). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared to control siRNA cells at the same time point. For 3-µm beads, having ∼11% of cells with a PI≤0.75 would be random MTOC distribution (see Fig. S1E and Table S2). (G–I) A20 cells were transduced with control siRNA or Rap1a and Rap1b siRNAs. Blots show Rap1 knockdown (G). Cells were mixed with 4.5-µm anti-IgG-coated beads for 30 min and stained for α-tubulin and F-actin. Representative confocal xy slices overlaid on DIC images (H). PIs and the percentage of cells (mean±s.e.m.) with a PI≤0.75 for >248 conjugates from four experiments (I). ****P<0.0001. (J,K) Vector control and RapGAPII-expressing A20 cells were mixed with 4.5-µm anti-IgG-coated beads. Pericentrin staining (J). K shows PIs and the percentage of cells with a PI≤0.75 for each time point (mean±s.e.m.; 12–37 conjugates per time point for each of three experiments). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared to control cells at the same time point. White arrows indicate the MTOC. Scale bars: 5 μm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Rap1 activation is important for MTOC polarization towards APCs. (A–D) LPS-stimulated primary B cells that were transduced with control siRNA or with Rap1a and Rap1b siRNAs were stained with CellTrace Far Red (pseudocolored blue) and mixed with APCs expressing anti-Igκ (antigen). B-cell–APC conjugates were stained for antigen and α-tubulin. Representative images of B cells that were mixed with APCs for 20 min (A). Arrows indicate the MTOC. Scale bar: 5 µm. PIs for >53 B-cell–APC conjugates from four experiments (B; quantified as in Fig. S1F). ****P<0.0001. C and D show the PI values and percentage of cells with a PI≤0.75 for the full timecourse (mean±s.e.m.; four experiments each with >45 conjugates per point). For APC experiments, 37.5% of cells with a PI≤0.75 would be random MTOC distribution. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared to control siRNA cells at the same time point. (E–G) Vector control and RapGAPII-expressing A20 cells were mixed with anti-Igκ-expressing APCs and then stained for α-tubulin. For A20 cells mixed with APCs for 30 min, PIs were calculated for >47 B-cell–APC conjugates from three experiments (E). ****P<0.0001. F and G shows the full timecourse (mean±s.e.m.; three experiments, each with >35 conjugates per point). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared to control cells at the same time point.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Cofilin controls BCR-induced MTOC polarization. (A,B) Primary B cells were treated with DMSO or 2 μM latrunculin A (Lat A) for 5 min, mixed with 4.5-µm anti-IgM-coated beads, and then stained for pericentrin. Representative confocal xy slices overlaid on DIC images (A). For the 30 min time point, PIs and the percentage of cells with a PI≤0.75 (∼20% would be random; see Table S1) were calculated for >156 conjugates from three experiments (B). (C,D) A20 cells expressing either WT or cofilin S3D fused to mCherry were mixed with anti-IgG-coated beads for 30 min. Representative confocal images of α-tubulin and F-actin staining (C). PIs for >79 cells from three experiments (D). (E,F) Primary B cells were treated with the control Q peptide (5 μM) or the M and W cofilin-inhibitory peptides (5 μM each) and then mixed with anti-IgM-coated beads for 30 min. Representative images of pericentrin staining (E). PIs for >43 cells from three experiments (F). (G–I) A20 cells were transduced with control siRNA or cofilin siRNA. Blot shows cofilin knockdown (G). The cells were mixed with anti-IgG-coated beads for 30 min, then stained for pericentrin and for the anti-IgG on the beads. Representative confocal images are shown (H; the dotted line is the outline of the cell) along with PIs for >29 cells. ****P<0.0001. (J,K) RapGAPII-expressing A20 cells transfected with WT cofilin or the constitutively active cofilin S3A fused to mCherry were mixed with anti-IgG-coated beads for 30 min. Representative confocal images of α-tubulin and F-actin staining (J). PIs for >51 cells from three experiments (K). ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. Scale bars: 5 μm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Cofilin-mediated actin reorganization is required for the MTOC to approach the plasma membrane. (A,B) A20 cells were treated with 5 μM of the control Q peptide (A) or with 5 μM each of the M and W cofilin-blocking peptides and then allowed to spread on anti-IgG-coated coverslips for 15 min. Cells were stained for α-tubulin and F-actin and imaged by TIRFM with a 100-nm depth. Fluorescence intensity profiles along the dotted lines are plotted along with the percentage of cells in which the MTOC was in the TIRF plane (B) (mean±s.e.m.; >41 cells per condition in each of three experiments). **P<0.01. (C–E) A20 cells transduced with control siRNA or cofilin siRNA were allowed to spread on anti-IgG-coated coverslips for 15–60 min and imaged by TIRFM with a 100-nm depth. Images of cells at the 15 min time point are shown (C). The percentage of cells with the MTOC within the TIRF plane (D) and the percentage of cells that exhibited a peripheral F-actin ring surrounding a central actin-depleted region (E) are shown for each time point. (F) A20 cells expressing GFP–α-tubulin and F-tractin-tdTomato were treated with control (Q) or cofilin-inhibitory (M and W) peptides, added to anti-Ig-coated coverslips, and imaged in real time for 8 min by confocal microscopy. The kymographs represent a time series of images for the confocal slice closest to the coverslip taken along the white line every 10 s. Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    IQGAP1 and CLIP-170 are required for BCR-induced MTOC reorientation. (A,B) A20 cells were treated with DMSO, 10 µM EHNA or 5 µM nocodazole for 30 min and then mixed with anti-Ig-coated beads for 30 min. Representative confocal images of pericentrin and DAPI staining (A) are shown along with MTOC PIs for >30 cells (B). (C,D) A20 cells were treated with DMSO, 10 µM EHNA or 20 µM ciliobrevin D for 40 min and then mixed for 30 min with beads that had been coated with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated anti-IgG. Representative xy confocal slices of pericentrin-stained cells (C, upper panels; dotted circles indicate the periphery of the cell) are shown along with 3D reconstructions of cells that had been stained for F-actin (C, lower panels). MTOC PIs for >33 cells (D). (E–I) A20 cells were transduced with lentiviruses containing the empty pGipZ vector, IQGAP1 shRNAs or CLIP-170 shRNA. Blots show IQGAP1 (E) and CLIP-170 (F) expression. The cells were mixed with anti-IgG-coated beads for 30 min and stained for pericentrin (G). Graphs show MTOC PIs for control versus IQGAP1 shRNA-expressing cells (H; >127 cells from three experiments) or control versus CLIP-170 shRNA-expressing cells (I; >126 cells from three experiments). The percentage of cells with a PI≤0.75 is indicated (∼20% would be random distribution; see Table S1). (J,K) Vector control, IQGAP1 shRNA and CLIP-170 shRNA cells were stained with CMFDA and then mixed with anti-Igκ-expressing APCs for 30 min. xy confocal slices of cells stained for α-tubulin and antigen (H). White arrows indicate the MTOC. For each cell population, MTOC PIs were quantified for >81 cells from three experiments (I). The percentage of cells with a PI≤0.75 is indicated (37.5% would be a random distribution). ****P<0.0001. Scale bars: 5 μm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Colocalization of IQGAP1, CLIP-170, and F-actin. B cells that had been added to anti-IgG-coated coverslips for 15 min were imaged by STED microscopy. (A) A20 cells that had been transfected with CLIP-170–GFP were stained with Rhodamine–phalloidin and with anti-α-tubulin antibody plus an Alexa Fluor 532-conjugated secondary antibody. CLIP-170–GFP fluorescence was imaged directly. An enlarged merged image is shown along with the individual channels. Scale bars: 10 µm. (B) A20 cells were stained with Rhodamine–phalloidin, anti-IQGAP1 antibody plus an Alexa 532-conjugated secondary antibody, and anti-α-tubulin plus an Alexa 488-conjugated secondary antibody. Scale bar: 5 μm. (C) A20 cells expressing CLIP-170–GFP were stained with Rhodamine–phalloidin and with anti-IQGAP1 plus an Alexa Fluor 532-conjugated secondary antibody. CLIP-170–GFP fluorescence was imaged directly. A 7× enlargement of the area in the white box is shown. All images are representative of multiple cells.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Rap1 promotes IQGAP1 accumulation at the IS by controlling actin organization. (A) A20 cells were treated with DMSO or 2 μM latrunculin A for 5 min, then mixed with anti-IgG-coated beads for 5 min. Cells were stained for IQGAP1, α-tubulin and F-actin. Confocal xy slices of bead–cell conjugates are shown. Dotted circles indicate the bead. (B–D) Vector control and RapGAPII-expressing A20 cells were mixed with anti-IgG-coated beads for 5 min, then stained for IQGAP1 and F-actin. For each conjugate, the corrected fluorescence intensity of F-actin (C) and IQGAP1 (D) within the white circle was quantified (in arbitrary units, AU) for >65 cells from two experiments. (E) LPS-activated primary B cells transfected with control siRNA or with Rap1a and Rap1b siRNAs were mixed with anti-Igκ-expressing APCs for 5 min and then stained for IQGAP1, F-actin and antigen. Arrows show the contact site between the B cell and the APC. (F–I) Vector control and RapGAPII-expressing A20 cells were allowed to spread on anti-IgG-coated coverslips for 15 min, then stained for IQGAP1 and F-actin and imaged by TIRFM or confocal microscopy. TIRFM images (F) and fluorescence profiles along the dotted lines are shown for representative cells (G). Confocal images were used to calculate Pearson's (H) and Manders' (I) coefficients for colocalization of IQGAP1 and F-actin. ****P<0.0001. Scale bars: 5 μm.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    IQGAP1 colocalization with F-actin and a model for Rap1-dependent MTOC reorientation. (A–F) A20 cells were treated with the control Q peptide or the M and W cofilin-inhibitory peptides (A–C), or with DMSO or 5 µM nocodazole (D–F) before being added to anti-IgG-coated coverslips for 15 min and then stained for IQGAP1 and actin. Representative confocal images are in A and D. Scale bar: 10 μm. Pearson's (B,E) and Manders' (C,F) coefficients for colocalization of IQGAP1 and F-actin are shown in the graphs. (G) Model. APC-bound antigen initiates localized BCR signaling and Rap1 activation. Rap1-GTP promotes cofilin dephosphorylation and stimulates cofilin-mediated actin severing. The resulting clearance of F-actin from the center of the B-cell–APC contact site is coupled to formation of a peripheral ring of branched actin that promotes B cell spreading. IQGAP1, which colocalizes with F-actin at the cell periphery, captures microtubule plus-ends by binding CLIP-170. As the cell spreads, forces are exerted on microtubules that are anchored to the peripheral F-actin ring. This, together with the minus-end-directed movement of cortex-associated dynein along these microtubules, moves the MTOC towards the IS. Dynein motor complexes then move BCR microclusters along juxtamembrane microtubules towards the MTOC to form a cSMAC.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Microtubule-organizing center
  • B cell
  • Immune synapse
  • Rap1
  • Cofilin

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Rap1–cofilin-1 pathway coordinates actin reorganization and MTOC polarization at the B cell immune synapse
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
Share
Research Article
The Rap1–cofilin-1 pathway coordinates actin reorganization and MTOC polarization at the B cell immune synapse
Jia C. Wang, Jeff Y.-J. Lee, Sonja Christian, May Dang-Lawson, Caitlin Pritchard, Spencer A. Freeman, Michael R. Gold
Journal of Cell Science 2017 130: 1094-1109; doi: 10.1242/jcs.191858
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
The Rap1–cofilin-1 pathway coordinates actin reorganization and MTOC polarization at the B cell immune synapse
Jia C. Wang, Jeff Y.-J. Lee, Sonja Christian, May Dang-Lawson, Caitlin Pritchard, Spencer A. Freeman, Michael R. Gold
Journal of Cell Science 2017 130: 1094-1109; doi: 10.1242/jcs.191858

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Mammalian TRP ion channels are insensitive to membrane stretch
  • Detecting single ORAI1 proteins within the plasma membrane reveals higher order channel complexes
  • Rhinovirus 2A is the key protease responsible for instigating the early block to gene expression in infected cells
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Imaging

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

ASCBǀEMBO 2019 Special Collection

We're at ASCB - visit booth 1000 to meet the JCS team!
Enjoy a collection of articles published in Journal of Cell Science by a range of speakers at the ASCBǀEMBO 2019 Meeting. Featuring articles from the labs of JCS Editorial Advisory Board members, all articles in the collection are free to access.


Early-bird meeting deadline - 20 December

Wotton House

Don’t miss the early-bird application deadline for the 2020 JCS meeting on Host-Pathogen interface! Taking place 17-20 May 2020 at Wotton House, Surrey, UK, the meeting will bring together experts working at the interface between cell biology and pathogens. Places are limited, so apply to attend now.


Cell Scientist to Watch – Elizabeth Hinde

Elizabeth with her daughter and father.

From physics and chemistry to art and back again, Elizabeth Hinde is currently based at the University of Melbourne. Her research focuses on fluorescence microscopy methods to quantify live-cell nuclear organisation and the role chromatin dynamics play in maintaining genome function. Read the full interview to find out more. 


Have you heard about our Travelling Fellowships?

Huw and colleagues from the lab in Beijing

Early-career researchers can apply for up to £2,500 to offset the cost of travel and expenses to make collaborative visits to other labs around the world. Read about Huw’s experience in Beijing, where he spent time with the world leaders in the development of super-resolution microscopy, the Li lab at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.


Articles of interest in our sister journals

Casein kinase 1α decreases β-catenin levels at adherens junctions to facilitate wound closure in Drosophila larvae
Chang-Ru Tsai, Michael J. Galko
Development

Spherical spindle shape promotes perpendicular cortical orientation by preventing isometric cortical pulling on both spindle poles during C. elegans female meiosis
Elizabeth Vargas, Karen P. McNally, Daniel B. Cortes, Michelle T. Panzica, Brennan M. Danlasky, Qianyan Li, Amy Shaub Maddox, Francis J. McNally
Development

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Journal of Cell Science
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992