Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Cell Science
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Journal of Cell Science

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS   Twitter  Facebook   YouTube  

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Cell Scientists to Watch
    • First Person
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About JCS
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Fast-track manuscripts
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • JCS Prize
    • Manuscript transfer network
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contact JCS
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
Research Article
F-actin flashes on phagosomes mechanically deform contents for efficient digestion in macrophages
Mathieu B. Poirier, Cara Fiorino, Thiviya K. Rajasekar, Rene E. Harrison
Journal of Cell Science 2020 133: jcs239384 doi: 10.1242/jcs.239384 Published 24 June 2020
Mathieu B. Poirier
Department of Cell & Systems Biology and the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cara Fiorino
Department of Cell & Systems Biology and the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thiviya K. Rajasekar
Department of Cell & Systems Biology and the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rene E. Harrison
Department of Cell & Systems Biology and the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rene E. Harrison
  • For correspondence: harrison@utsc.utoronto.ca

Handling Editor: Daniel Billadeau

  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    F-actin flashes occur on CR-phagosomes in macrophages and correlate with particle deformation. (A) Live-cell imaging of RAW 264.7 cells or (C) BMDM cells transfected with LifeAct-CFP or LifeAct-RFP and challenged with C3bi-sRBCs to induce CR-mediated phagocytosis. (B) Line scan showing another typical F-actin flashing event shown as fold change of LifeAct-CFP signal intensity over time (normalized to background) at the CR-phagosome membrane post particle internalization. (D) The frequency of phagosomes exhibiting F-actin flashes was measured in RAW 264.7 cells expressing LifeAct-CFP after ingestion of IgG-sRBCs versus C3bi-sRBCs. PMA was used to activate integrins. (E) The frequency of F-actin flashes on phagosomes versus actin comet tails was also tabulated in RAW 264.7 cells expressing LifeAct-CFP and ingesting C3bi-sRBCs. (F) Immunofluorescence image of RAW 264.7 cells after 40 min of uptake of C3bi-E. coli stained with anti-E. coli antibodies (red) and phalloidin (green). (G) DIC imaging was performed to assay the fate of sRBCs inside flashing phagosomes. DIC images showing C3bi-sRBC deformation, including cell lysis, as well as some fission events. (H) Quantification of the frequency of these events in flashing phagosomes. For quantifications, n=50 phagosomes were assayed in three biological replicates. Error bars represent s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01. Arrows indicate F-actin flashes and arrowheads show sRBC lysis in the DIC channel. Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Particle rigidity influences F-actin flashing dynamics on phagosomes. RAW 264.7 macrophages stably transfected with LifeAct-RFP or LifeAct-CFP were challenged with either C3bi-opsonized sRBC or C3bi-opsonized polystyrene beads (3.87 μm) and monitored with epifluorescence. (A) Duration of F-actin recruitment on phagosomes from the initial increase in LifeAct signal, back to cytosolic levels (n=87 F-actin flashes from C3bi-sRBC phagosomes, n=50 F-actin flashes from C3bi-beads phagosomes). (B) Sum of the time taken for all F-actin recruitment events on a given CR-phagosome (n=15 C3bi-sRBC phagosomes, n=14 C3bi-beads phagosomes). (C) Time interval between two F-actin flashes on a given CR-phagosome (n=72 intervals from C3bi-sRBC phagosomes, n=36 from C3bi-beads phagosomes). (D) Time for first F-actin flash on phagosomes from phagocytic cup formation (n=15 phagosomes for each treatment). (E) Total number of F-actin flashes on a given CR-phagosome (n=15 phagosomes for each treatment). (F) Frequency of F-actin flashes on CR-phagosomes (n=3, averages within a given field of view at 40× magnification, from a total of 67 flashing CR-phagosomes and 204 non-flashing CR-phagosomes). (G,H) Representation of F-actin flashing dynamics on C3bi-sRBCs (G) and C3bi-beads (H). Error bars represent s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    CR3 integrin and focal adhesion proteins are recruited to F-actin flashes on phagosomes. (A) Immunofluorescence images of fixed RAW 264.7 macrophages challenged with C3bi-opsonized beads for 45 min. External particles were immunostained prior to cell permeabilization. F-actin was labeled with rhodamine phalloidin and cells were immunostained for CR3, talin, FAK or phospho-FAK (Tyr397). Arrows indicate F-actin flashing phagosomes and arrowheads indicate non-flashing phagosomes. (B) Quantification of recruitment of CR3, talin, FAK and phospho-FAK to flashing or non-flashing phagosomes after 45 min of internalization. CR3 recruitment to phagosomes was also analyzed at 20 min post-internalization. Numbers of phagosomes quantified were as follows: talin, n=50; FAK and phospho-FAK, n=90; CR3, n>150. (C) Live imaging of RAW 264.7 cells co-transfected with mEmerald-talin and LifeAct-RFP. Arrows indicate flashing phagosomes and time is indicated in minutes from the start of imaging. (D,E) Quantification of LifeAct (LA)-RFP flashing dynamics on 15 phagosomes from four independent movies. In mEmerald-talin transfected cells, the duration of LA-RFP recruitment to phagosomes was similar (D), but there was a significant increase in time between flashes on phagosomes, compared with cells transfected with LA-RFP alone (E). (F) Representative live-cell fluorescence images of RAW 264.7 cells stably transfected with LifeAct-RFP and transiently transfected with PH-PLCδ-GFP. Time is indicated in minutes, beginning from phagocytic cup formation. Arrowhead indicates a F-actin cup and arrows indicate a flashing phagosome that did not recruit the PI(4,5)P2 probe. Error bars represent s.e.m. **P<0.01. Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    RhoA and Arp2/3 effectors are recruited and required for F-actin flashes on phagosomes. (A) Immunofluorescence images of fixed RAW 264.7 macrophages challenged with C3bi-opsonized beads for 45 min and stained with phalloidin for F-actin and antibodies against RhoA, p190RhoGAP, p34 Arp2/3 or WASP. Arrows indicate F-actin flashing phagosomes and arrowheads indicate non-flashing phagosomes. (B) Quantification of recruitment of RhoA, p190RhoGAP, p34 Arp2/3 or WASP to F-actin flashing or non-flashing phagosomes after 45 min of internalization. Numbers of phagosomes quantified were as follows: RhoA and WASP, n=20; p190RhoGAP, n>250; p34, n>350. (C) Live-cell imaging of RAW 264.7 cells co-transfected with GFP-rGBD and LifeAct-RFP. Arrow indicates a flashing phagosome after uptake of multiple particles and time is indicated in minutes from the start of imaging. Dashed boxes in the right-hand images indicate the region shown at higher magnification. (D,E) Quantification of GFP-rGBD flashing dynamics on seven phagosomes from four independent movies. In GFP-rGBD-transfected cells, the duration of LifeAct (LA)-RFP recruitment to phagosomes was similar (D), with a slight, but not significant, increase in time between flashes on phagosomes, compared with cells transfected with LA-RFP alone (E). (F) For ROCK inhibition, cells were pretreated with 10 μM Y-27632 ROCK inhibitor for 8 h prior to phagocytosis and fixation. F-actin was stained using rhodamine phalloidin to detect the number of flashing phagosomes in untreated cells, which was significantly reduced in Y-27632-treated cells. Three biological replicates were performed. (G) Spinning disk confocal imaging of LifeAct-RFP-expressing RAW 264.7 cells after uptake of C3bi-sRBCs and treatment with 150 μM CK-666 to inhibit Arp2/3. Arrow indicates a flashing phagosome that persisted for an extended period. Time is indicated in minutes from the start of imaging. (H) Number of phagosomes that exhibited F-actin flashes (LifeAct-RFP recruitment) in CK-666-treated cells, compared with DMSO-treated cells. (n>200 phagosomes). (I–K) Quantification of flashing dynamics and particle deformation in LifeAct-RFP-positive phagosomes in CK-666-treated macrophages; 30 flashing phagosomes from ten independent movies were analyzed. (I) Average flashing time and time between flashes in cells treated with CK-666. (J) Of the phagosomes that recruited LifeAct-RFP, frequent phenotypes included protracted (extended) flashes on phagosomes and long flashes with extended time between flashes. (K) sRBC morphology changes observed by DIC imaging in CK-666-treated cells. The majority (21/30) of sRBCs in LifeAct-RFP-positive phagosomes had no detectable change in morphology in Arp2/3-inhibited cells, with only nine out of 30 sRBCs showing detectable deformation in the presence of the drug. Error bars represent s.e.m. **P<0.01. Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Non-muscle myosin IIA is present on flashing phagosomes and its inhibition attenuates particle deformation in phagosomes. (A) Immunofluorescence images of fixed RAW macrophages challenged with C3bi-beads for a 10 min pulse, followed by washing and allowing phagocytosis to proceed for 30 min. External beads were stained with Cy5. F-actin was labeled with rhodamine phalloidin and NMIIA was immunostained with a polyclonal antibody (Biolegend). Arrows indicate a F-actin flashing phagosome that was positive for NMIIA, and arrowheads indicate a non-flashing phagosome that did not recruit myosin. (B) To test for myosin involvement in F-actin flashing and particle deformation, cells were pretreated, or not, with 100 μM blebbistatin prior to C3bi-sRBC ingestion and live fluorescent imaging. Arrows indicate a LifeAct-RFP-positive phagosome in control (DMSO) cells where particle deformation was observed using DIC imaging. Arrowheads indicate a LifeAct-RFP-positive phagosome in blebbistatin-treated cells, where no visible changes in sRBC morphology were observed by DIC microscopy. (C) Frequency of F-actin flashes for phagosomes in untreated cells compared with treated cells. (D) Frequency of phagosome deformation observed through DIC in F-actin-positive phagosomes (n>50 phagosomes from three replicates of each treatment). Error bars represent s.e.m. **P<0.01. Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    F-actin flashes delay EEA1 recruitment and reduces LAMP accumulation on phagosomes. (A) RAW 264.7 cells challenged with C3bi-beads were fixed every 5 min after particle internalization for a total of 60 min and stained for EEA1 and F-actin. Arrows indicate a flashing phagosome and arrowheads indicate a phalloidin-negative phagosome. (B) EEA1 recruitment frequency to CR-phagosomes was determined at every time point (n=229 F-actin flashing CR-phagosomes across three biological replicates; n=1259 phalloidin-negative CR-phagosomes across three biological replicates). (C) To analyze the effects of F-actin flashing on phagolysosome formation, RAW 264.7 cells were fixed after 30 min of phagocytosis of C3bi-sRBCs. Cells were stained for LAMP1, F-actin and sRBCs. Arrows and arrowheads indicate flashing and non-flashing phagosomes, respectively. (D) The frequency of LAMP1-positive phagosomes was determined (n=24 flashing CR-phagosomes across three biological replicates; n=173 non-flashing phagosomes across three biological replicates). Error bars represent s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01. Scale bars: 10 µm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    F-actin flashes on phagosomes causes ultrastructural changes and enhanced degradation of internalized contents. (A) Correlative TEM analysis showing a LifeAct-CFP-positive phagosome by epifluorescence. TEM images show the same RAW 264.7 macrophage at high resolution. One phagosome is surrounded by a thick network of cytoskeleton and the sRBC is more electron dense (arrows) compared with adjacent non-flashing phagosomes (arrowheads). (B) RAW 264.7 cells stably transfected with LifeAct-RFP were challenged with DQ Green BSA-bound C3bi-sRBCs. Proteolysis of phagosome contents caused an increase in fluorescence signal intensity. Live-cell images were taken using epifluorescence microscopy, with 0 min reflecting the start of imaging. Arrows denote F-actin flashing phagosomes and arrowheads indicate non-flashing phagosomes. (C) Densitometry of DQ Green BSA signal over time in flashing and non-flashing phagosomes post phagocytic cup formation (n=3 biological replicates). Error bars represent s.e.m. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Scale bars: 10 µm.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Macrophages
  • Phagocytosis
  • Complement
  • Phagosome maturation

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Cell Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
F-actin flashes on phagosomes mechanically deform contents for efficient digestion in macrophages
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Cell Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Cell Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
F-actin flashes on phagosomes mechanically deform contents for efficient digestion in macrophages
Mathieu B. Poirier, Cara Fiorino, Thiviya K. Rajasekar, Rene E. Harrison
Journal of Cell Science 2020 133: jcs239384 doi: 10.1242/jcs.239384 Published 24 June 2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
F-actin flashes on phagosomes mechanically deform contents for efficient digestion in macrophages
Mathieu B. Poirier, Cara Fiorino, Thiviya K. Rajasekar, Rene E. Harrison
Journal of Cell Science 2020 133: jcs239384 doi: 10.1242/jcs.239384 Published 24 June 2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • Peer review history
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Switching between blebbing and lamellipodia depends on the degree of non-muscle myosin II activity
  • Kindlin-2 promotes rear focal adhesion disassembly and directional persistence during cell migration
  • Histone chaperone APLF level dictates the implantation of mouse embryos
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Mechanobiology

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Development

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

2020 at The Company of Biologists

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were able to bring a number of long-term projects and new ventures to fruition. While we look forward to a new year, join us as we reflect on the triumphs of the last 12 months.


Mole – The Corona Files

"This is not going to go away, 'like a miracle.' We have to do magic. And I know we can."

Mole continues to offer his wise words to researchers on how to manage during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Cell scientist to watch – Christine Faulkner

In an interview, Christine Faulkner talks about where her interest in plant science began, how she found the transition between Australia and the UK, and shares her thoughts on virtual conferences.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

“The clear advantages are rapid and efficient exposure and easy access to my article around the world. I believe it is great to have this publishing option in fast-growing fields in biomedical research.”

Dr Jaceques Behmoaras (Imperial College London) shares his experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 60 institutions in 12 countries taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


JCS and COVID-19

For more information on measures Journal of Cell Science is taking to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic, please see here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hestiate to contact the Editorial Office.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Interviews
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Journal of Cell Science
  • Editors and Board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For Authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Fast-track manuscripts
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • JCS Prize
  • Manuscript transfer network
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal Info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contacts

  • Contact JCS
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992